Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genetic 'Bottlenecks' and the Flood
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 59 (41337)
05-26-2003 4:09 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Alec
05-25-2003 10:30 PM


quote:
Not necessarily. For example, species of amphibians, fish, and insects would not necessarily have genetic evidence of a bottleneck in them because they wouldn't have all died during the Flood of Noah. It is significant to note that the animals that would have gone on the ark--mammals, reptiles, and bird--have a lower averge heterozygosity than the animals that wouldn't have needed to go on the ark.
Chimps have a greater heterozygosity than humans, which were "obviously" on the ark. Would that mean chimps can survive a flood without taken aboard the ark?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Alec, posted 05-25-2003 10:30 PM Alec has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024