Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genetic 'Bottlenecks' and the Flood
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 30 of 59 (41432)
05-27-2003 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Alec
05-26-2003 11:54 PM


In a previous exchange:
quote:
but will survive indefinitely in that medium if gradually acclimated to it.
Is that consistent with a sudden, global deluge? It doesn't seem so to me.
It seems to me that this crys out for quantification. How long, days, hours, weeks in "gradually" in the first one? ANd how "sudden" is the second?
As far as speciation: We're finding different mechanisms all the time of rapid speciation that could have happened post-Flood. For example, introns (usally labelled Junk DNA) could have played a role. Depending on where the cell begins transcription, different genes can be produced. The founder effect also stimulated variation, for example it alters pleiotropic balance, and founder populations have a great range of variation. Inbreeding depression would have selected for animals that would have been more fit early, also. Genes are highly interactive, and rapid post-Flood variation would have been possible.
Certainly, we understand that evolution can happen pretty quickly under some circumstances. But there are at least a couple of problems with the idea.
1) The raw speed of the speciation. I've seen some creationist sites that have "kind" at the family level. For there to be no historic record of this happening the full range of speciation would have to have been complete sometime well before 2000 years ago.
2) Why did it stop? There is no suggestion of a mechanism that can turn on and off that extremely.
I'm afraid that an arm waving explanation like this isn't going to hold up under any kind of close examination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Alec, posted 05-26-2003 11:54 PM Alec has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024