Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9077 total)
81 online now:
PaulK, Stile, vimesey (3 members, 78 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,031 Year: 5,143/6,534 Month: 563/794 Week: 54/135 Day: 0/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why is the lack of "fur" positive Progression for humans?
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3199 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 38 of 202 (450727)
01-23-2008 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by dwise1
01-18-2008 8:06 PM


i wonder if there has been an increase in maternal mortality due to large-headed babies since the invention of the c-section. i.e. large-headedness can survive sometimes, but when a c-section isn't available, the mother is more likely to die.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by dwise1, posted 01-18-2008 8:06 PM dwise1 has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Jaderis, posted 01-23-2008 2:07 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3199 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 40 of 202 (450761)
01-23-2008 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Jaderis
01-23-2008 2:07 PM


the more important issue is where the parents were born, then, and not where the current pregnancy is taking place. or rather, whether the current pregnancy is taking place in an area with less access to c-sections.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Jaderis, posted 01-23-2008 2:07 PM Jaderis has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022