Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
662 online now:
DrJones*, PaulK, Tangle (3 members, 659 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,066 Year: 5,178/6,534 Month: 21/577 Week: 9/80 Day: 9/11 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   why is the lack of "fur" positive Progression for humans?
Inactive Member

Message 185 of 202 (533712)
11-02-2009 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by arrogantape
10-31-2009 4:26 PM

It seems non plausible to me that scientists staring at the Hobbit's feet don't entertain at least a fleeting thought the feet are great for water propulsion. Michael phelps had large feet, short legs, and a long powerful torso. The Hobbit is built the same, but with a downward curve of the clavicle, giving the hobbit a streamlined neck to shoulder shape.

Exercise cannot be genetically imparted to the progeny, so it is irrelevant. That large feet incidentally may have helped its survivability is something to look at, but it obviously didn't help the little Ebu Gogo enough.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." --John Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by arrogantape, posted 10-31-2009 4:26 PM arrogantape has taken no action

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022