Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9077 total)
169 online now:
CosmicChimp, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Stile, vimesey (5 members, 164 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,031 Year: 5,143/6,534 Month: 563/794 Week: 54/135 Day: 0/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why is the lack of "fur" positive Progression for humans?
Meddle
Member (Idle past 542 days)
Posts: 179
From: Scotland
Joined: 05-08-2006


Message 174 of 202 (509698)
05-23-2009 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by arrogantape
05-23-2009 9:13 PM


That Nature article...
Another thing that has me excited are the big flat feet. This is a very archaic condition. Not having the specialty bone needed to create an arch left it with a big chimp foot.

I found the Nature article on the analysis of H.floresiensis feet being hosted on the institution website of one of the authors. Although H.floresiensis feet are indeed large compared to modern humans, the relative proportions of the feet are comparable to bonobos, which are smaller than the common chimpanzee. While your earlier comparison of the size of feet being akin to 'skin diving fins' was as you say an exaggeration, it would appear to be misleading.

Edited by Malcolm, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by arrogantape, posted 05-23-2009 9:13 PM arrogantape has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022