Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Smoking-Gun Evidence of Man-Monkey Kindred: Episode II... Tails
Carico
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 127 (266157)
12-06-2005 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ApostateAbe
02-07-2005 3:21 PM


So where has anyone ever witnessed a species being born from parents with whom it is not capable of breeding? The theory of evolution is something that could be found in the National Enquirer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ApostateAbe, posted 02-07-2005 3:21 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nwr, posted 12-06-2005 7:21 PM Carico has replied
 Message 56 by Gary, posted 12-07-2005 11:33 AM Carico has not replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 127 (266387)
12-07-2005 12:52 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by nwr
12-06-2005 7:21 PM


You missed my point completely. A species simply cannot produce offspring of a different species with whom it cannot breed. It is simply a fact that animals and humans cannot interbreed. Therefore it is absolutely impossible for a human to be the descendant of an ape. So evolutionists need to address their faulty premise before even beinginng to consider elaborating on it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by nwr, posted 12-06-2005 7:21 PM nwr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 1:01 PM Carico has replied
 Message 60 by AdminNosy, posted 12-07-2005 1:27 PM Carico has not replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 127 (266415)
12-07-2005 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Yaro
12-07-2005 1:01 PM


My siblings are still human beings who are incapable of breeding with an ape. So again, please tell us how animals can exchange genes with humans since they cannot interbreed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 1:01 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 1:44 PM Carico has replied
 Message 64 by Gary, posted 12-07-2005 2:33 PM Carico has replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 127 (266423)
12-07-2005 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Yaro
12-07-2005 1:44 PM


I hadn't gotten any replies to my posts until today so I posted them in more than one category. But my post also corresponds to the threads in which I posted and I cannot procced with those discussions without reference to the statements I've made. But i would also love to discuss this with you in the thread you mentioned. Thanks.
This message has been edited by Carico, 12-07-2005 01:47 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 1:44 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by AdminPhat, posted 12-07-2005 3:37 PM Carico has not replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 127 (266477)
12-07-2005 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by Gary
12-07-2005 2:33 PM


I understand that evolutionists hold that humans have "evolved" over millions of years. I never said that evolutionists claim that 2 apes instantly bred a human. I'm saying that apes and humans cannot exchange genes with each other so it is impossible for the genes of a human to even get into an ape in the first place! But evolutionists forget that and claim that apes spontaneously changed on their own. There is not only zero proof for this because apes are still around today and not changing on their own, but offspring acquire genes from the mating between their parents. What makes each human unique is the specific set of genes acquired from its parents. And so far, no human has ever bred anything other than a human being and neither has any animal ever bred a creature that turned into a human being!
Each species passes along the set of genes unique to its species to its offspring. And that is why birds breed birds, dogs, breed dogs, cats breed cats, apes breed apes and humans breed humans. This is so elementary yet evolution contradicts it.
The theory of evolution is all from the imagination. It came from "Hey, what if men came from apes? How could this be possible"? And that started the imagination working over time. And because it's a human theory,it will always be fallible and there will always be holes in it...gaping holes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Gary, posted 12-07-2005 2:33 PM Gary has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Gary, posted 12-07-2005 3:38 PM Carico has replied
 Message 68 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2005 4:13 PM Carico has replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 127 (266652)
12-07-2005 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Gary
12-07-2005 3:38 PM


How can apes have the genes of humans and humans have the genes of an ape if we cannot interbreed? Do you not know that genes are passed along through mating and producing offspring? Do you not know that offspring resemble their parents? Yet human beings are so obviously different than apes who are in the jungles and in zoos where man put them and we rule over them just like the bible says we do. Why do humans not produce offspring with wings? Why haven't we simply developed that gene like evolutionists claim apes developed the gene for speech, cognition, the ability to form complex analyses and walk on 2 lesg? Just luck? And as you can see, no ape has those traits today and no one has ever witnessed an ape with those trait
s since the beginning of recorded history.
By the reasoning of evolutionists, I can say that we came from birds who dropped the gene for wings and have now become extinct. I can say anything happened before there were witnesses and people would believe me if I have a ph.d. That is how much power people give those with a ph.d. unless people can learn to think for themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Gary, posted 12-07-2005 3:38 PM Gary has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2005 11:51 PM Carico has not replied
 Message 71 by MangyTiger, posted 12-07-2005 11:57 PM Carico has not replied
 Message 72 by Coragyps, posted 12-08-2005 12:05 AM Carico has not replied

Carico
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 127 (266674)
12-08-2005 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by crashfrog
12-07-2005 4:13 PM


Sorry, but I just replied to an evolutionist who said that humans only breed humans and apes only breed apes. Are you suggesting otherwise? how do you support your theory if evolutionists themselves can't even agree on whether or not humans descended from apes?
But assuming that you believe that humans descended from apes even thoug other evolutionists do not, cats and dogs both have 4 legs, 2 eyes, 2 noses, 2 ears, whiskers, mammary glands and a mouth yet they cannot interbreed. There are many, many species who are alike but did not descend from each other. God created many, many species with similar traits but as separate species who all have a specific function in the world. We also have similar characteristics of plants. We both need food, water, mate, and grow. Does that make us plants? Of course not. And all this theorizing simply to deny that God exists, yet reality supports the biblical account of creation perfectly.
This message has been edited by Carico, 12-08-2005 12:15 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2005 4:13 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by crashfrog, posted 12-08-2005 12:20 AM Carico has not replied
 Message 78 by Gary, posted 12-08-2005 4:59 AM Carico has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024