Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,472 Year: 3,729/9,624 Month: 600/974 Week: 213/276 Day: 53/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why DID we evolve into humans?
TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 215 of 231 (305329)
04-19-2006 6:53 PM


STOP IT
i was just thinking - why did we evolve into the state we are in now-
To answer Tom's overwrought consciousness without prompting debate or critizing creationism, thinking is where you went wrong. You are ignorant in the fields in which, if you had the capacity to study, you would find answers that would prompt more coherent questions, in which more controversy about those answers would arise. This forum has existed for 3 years and I have just stumbled across it and to my dismay I witnessed, before my very eyes the gradual dissengration of a once noble race(not to scale). I have witnessed bitterness "care to elaborate which they were and i'll explain what i meant by them? thanks" to complete and utter ignorance "if we so wanted to do so many things that we can't in our natural state- why did we not just evolve them-such as wings to fly, gills to stay under water longer." Into even more pompous hubris, " have not seen some of this dren in a while. ..... This is absolute bull."
After having succumb to the overwhelming desire to post on a page where way too many people offer opinions and compare scrap books of memory and collected knowledge, I have to ask myself what my role is in this magnificient forum. reflecting..... i am sickened.
Those quotes i used above were from the first page. I blame Tom for opening up the airwaves with his poor ability to communicate linguistically, and if I were his teacher i would wash his mouth out for asking why with such frivolent, innocent but unnecessary passion.
This will most definantly come off as the pinnacle of pompous language but if i accomplish one thing, god willing, i will become the object of contempt, and like jesus on the cross, be able to stop you all from debating and unite you in a single cause.. "flaming" of me.
If you, in fact, feel united upon that one principle by me simultaneously "flaming" every single person that has spoken in response to Tom's why, that principle of hate.. and whatever your feelings after reading my post are, take a moment, read what began this crusade to answer ignorance with rationale.. both forms of human thought, that is Tom's ignorance.. levin's wisdom.. and the dissenting dissintegration from the origin thereof.
With a final quote.. a more up to date idea,
"And if there is no God what are we then?
DUHHHHH???

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Malachi-II, posted 04-20-2006 5:16 AM TheFonziszen has not replied
 Message 217 by AdminNWR, posted 04-20-2006 9:00 AM TheFonziszen has not replied

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 219 of 231 (305574)
04-20-2006 11:03 PM


Off Topic
Quote: “The only reasonable end in man’s unreasonable existence is god. You ask me do I believe in god? I believe he is dead.”
You completely lost me. Who asked if you believe in god? If you are saying that the end of man’s existence will be the ”grave’ along with god (if that is what you think) then I’m sorry.
Depression doesnt begin to describe the state I was in when I wrote the post. Despair would be better. To clarify, by saying god is the only reasonable end to man's unreasonable existence is an aphorism that asserts that when man found his existence to be unreasonable he invented god. In the chain of causation, through our reality and concept of time, the questions that seek reason go on forever, that is undeniable, IS IT NOT? It is ironic that you twisted my words with your metonymy, no.. you might be thinking, but my schizophrenic humor thinks it quaint.
First of all, that wasnt what i was thinking. The end of most men's existence is a grave, quite literally, but the aphorism was intended to declare subtlely, and existentially, the kind of hubris present on this site and through history is the kind of nonsense that metamorphosis into sense and then myth and that becomes fact and then turns into a belief and then a religion. The depression i feel when i look around is undeniable.. einstein said We cannot despair of humanity, since we ourselves are human beings. Though i know the despair is selfrighteous it is also based. The despair i feel towards the human condition is attributed partly to the war of faith that insues all over the world, every organized religion is founded upon simliar concepts yet not a one can claim truthfully to be tolerant, inside them all is some form of bigotry. In my eyes at this present moment, religions are failed sciences that attempted to methodize life and the experiences therein that are our only evidence of input. But im off topic again.
For you to claim that i believe man's fate is in the grave i frown that we are so misunderstood.
"If you are saying that the end of man’s existence will be the ”grave’ along with god"
To reveal the irony, man is digging and constructing his own grave, in his seeking nothingness(now take a second and realize the fatal error of most belief systems, their fatalism, even you yourself suffer from the sort of fatalism.."Many of our species, particularly some scientists, may believe they have the power of God. I think they are premature. We have a long way to go. Right now we are merely children of God. Evolution is far from complete. " far from complete.. this is the problem with IT all, the god presumption, yes we are evolving, yes we have an objective and subjective reasoning that is evolving, but all of the theologists see this evolution with a conclusion.. a level of existence that is pure energy(complete) and like jesus we will have the powers of god..these irrationalities form the wood and shovel that dig and construct the grave made by man for man that wont be of any use to the last man, who wont have anyone to place him within the eloquent grave, that houses man's eloquent body, in an eloquent way.
Basically, to weigh my opinion for what it is worth, nothing is written in stone, mankind can overcome, can prevail, and like we have in the past.. survive, but we cannot reach a level of existence where we no longer exist or where the many are one and the heaven is eternal, sorry you'll always come down rough off of your ecstasy trip(every action has an equal and opposite reaction)-that's newton, read the paper you'll clearly see some people choose hell and are 'happy'(modern man's absolute value), alongside lucifer, we are slowly growing away from self-centered ideals, as god is replaced with reason, the very reason god came onto the scene was because we lacked it.
So to Tom, ill offer some cogency, and a quote from a wise son of a bitch, "Worship the sun, because you can see it."-george carlin.
you said
"we no longer need to evolve as we just "invent" or make what we need" evolution hasnt always been productive, species go extinct, we are a species, we have created god in the image of ourselves, not the other way around, and i asked myself about what he would think about our opinions, the "opinions" you so lightly refer to are beliefs that have meant death as a reaction to the desire to hold onto those beliefs, or defend those beliefs. Noble, indeed, but stupid. Picture our species, dissected by a future "intelligent form of life" and think what they might say about the way we have been living for millenia.. "granted" the gift of reason, we cannot see the ability of our kin to reason, we accept as absolute our notions while trying to destroy the notions of our brothers. Billions believe that christ will walk the earth again and that he will take us away from this world into another.. They also prey upon the innocent and suffering to convert to their cause.. They find people who are willing to be raped for food, and slip the shaft of the cross in slow.. while if you turn the globe the arabs are suiciding for virgins, so convinced in the power of death that they'll end their life for the chance to devirginize a young woman. A common belief among these two groups is that life is a preparation for death.. the religions are living to die, these religions have existed for a long while.. now man has already noticeably evolved through our increased breeding into a homosapian with a much smaller frame, because like it has been said, we evolve towards what we need, with the comforts of this godgranted kingdom we dont need a strong frame to survive, genetics happens and it shrinks. My 'depressed' picture of man is a lifeform that has found intelligence.. reason.. and has harnessed it and while it harnessed it, it has conquered this planet, to fallback on a axiom, "power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely," so man is now granting himself absolute power as he creates a science for experience. If god has absolute power, and we seek god, to be in his image, to do as he has deemed right, then we are seeking power, and in seeking it we seek corruption. Now amorally, the christians are no better then the muslims, i open my arms for your response on my half coherent rantings.
"So every thinking person who is living, and those who are not, can decide if God exists; never existed; is alive or dead. But consider this: would God give a damn what we think? If God is the Intelligent Designer of the universe, do you think for one moment the opinions of little men and women will have any bearing on evolution of the universe? Come on!"
I dont, but many do, why else would they hold onto their beliefs? They think them necessary for survival. How can our opinions and beliefs.. that you have belittled... quite obnoxciously.. NOT have a bearing on the evolution of.. wait the universe? now what the fuck are you talking about? Back to that omnipotent existence of man.. NO it wont have any bearing on the evolutino of the universe.. jackass.. but it will definantly have a bearing on the survival or extinction of our species.. on the future evolution of our speices.. how can it not.. answer me that.. how can it not? You make those opinions out to be inconsequential.. well they are what we do now.. they are evolving, and we are evolving with them, because of them, alongside them, as a result of them? what does it matter?.. the universe is evolving.. SEPERATELY
On a more serious note.. i apologize to Tom for misguided feelings of despair.. also, i would like to restate the purpose of the original post and why i was so awe strucken into talking on a forum(something i havent done before), this particular topic, shows the small scale evolution of wonder gone wry, rationally posed questions with no rational answer, because rationale is a human characteristic. The posts on the page, over a 3 year period began as logical, then became more and more conjested and will continue to do so(my prediction), many questions were answered, and thoughts confirmed or expanded.. but the point is.. there is no point.. absolutely no point to a circle, look for one.. bet you cant find it, rape me.

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Malachi-II, posted 04-21-2006 12:56 PM TheFonziszen has not replied
 Message 227 by Malachi-II, posted 04-22-2006 4:32 AM TheFonziszen has not replied

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 221 of 231 (305712)
04-21-2006 3:34 PM


Thanks for the choices
Malachi, thanks for making my first experience on forums an enjoyable one, also thanks for offering me the options to be polite or fuck off, but they're both so appealing i dont know which to choose. You've helped me realize what i already knew, that is, my reason for posting. To explain ill just say.. that it is healthy to discuss freely the thoughts and opinions that flow through ones mind without complacency. We can agree that that is what i was doing.. because god knows i wasnt trying to be complaisant. And through this experience i better understand the benefits of such a forum and your delightful response has stifled the overwhelming superiority i feel over others on matters of metaphysics. I feel off the soap box and able to speak rationally, wonder how long that will last?
So for your proposed debate on religion.. that debate has been concluded and religion has lost, yet billions still remain faithful in irrational ideals. I read the story in that link you suggested and it is interesting enough. So how about a more interesting topic than that cliche. The origin of religion.
Martin Luther King wrote a great interpretive research paper on the origins of religion in the race. http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/publications/papers/vol1/...
The origin is irretrievably lost in the past but the foundatinos of which religions were established recur throughout almost every civilization. So picture early man, the homosapian, a naturally social being that lives in packs that were probably much similiar to wolves or apes of our present age. The packs existed in a time before religion.. before math, science, language, semantics or any established ideology.. therefore they were the ancestors of these ideologies and there actions, in essence, would decide on the future of the species. They were beasts, by our standards, that is undeniable. Animals.. that we are, that we forget we still are, because of nobility. So what I am getting at is simply the middle of two extremes, MLK's disavowance that no matter what crudeness religion originated, we should take it as it has become.. compared to this evolutionists view on the topic.. http://www.banned-books.com/...1994archive/121_1/ts211q.html
basically summing religion up as a gene that once was necessary but is now obsolete.
Since you have no idea who i am ill say one personal belief that me and those close to me share.. anyone who tries to force their beliefs upon another is unjust.. My personal problem with religion is the fact that they have become congolmerates of faith.. all over the world.. people recruit like the military.. and they establish a business like organization..
But im plagued with the idea that.. well.. like all businesses.. they exist for a reason.. if the product wasnt desired.. there would be no business.. no profit.. They would go out of business if there wasn't a clientele.. In my mind this is rooted in the existence of suffering, starvation, and inequality. Religion is no cure.. it is an opium for those who are neglected.. or those who are addicted.. an attempt.. many attempts at a cure.. but it is something we are developing away from.. but desperately holding onto.. hell we're having to create new forms of it in scientology just to feed the addictions we have caused.
I respect your replys to my despair malachi but save me your apathy.. Hope this post winds you up a little bit
{Shortened display form of 1 URL, to restore page width to normal. - Adminnemooseus}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-21-2006 08:39 PM

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 222 of 231 (305724)
04-21-2006 3:55 PM


Malachi -- C&E united
"C&E United
I would like to debate the proposition that creation and evolution are two concepts of an inseparable reality. I will argue that, whilst it is important to recognize the essential role of every iota, it is vitally important to understand and demonstrate the function of creation and evolution. I will argue that human intelligence has evolved for that purpose; that we are at one with the cosmos; and in knowing that, is what sets us free. "
as i am about to write a paper on existentialism for a course.. your proclamation reminds me of an existentialist philosophy. It seems to me that no matter where you go, in the world of argument and discussion, there is some form of prejudice encircling it all. The prejudices feed upon one another.
What you say about being at one with the cosmos.. it makes me think two things.. first of all.. i think it silly and damn near gay. The other thing i think is a sort of reflection.. the cosmos.. what we know if it.. is only what we can perceive of it.. that infinite universe is our perception of it.. from this planet.. and think of how that has changed. no doubt im not giving you new information in saying we once thought that we were the center of it all.. and now cosmology has convinced some people we're not.. but yet it exists, trust me, it exists those people who deny that.. and from the point im taking right now.. good for them for not being complacent. Because, i know im contradicting myself, all we know of the universe is our perception of it.. death is the loss of one perception.. and since i have just recently read 1984, i realized how important it is to hold on to your individual perception and to be true to it through whatever fears are imposed upon you, death or torture to name a few.
So if one truely accepts the subjectivity of the human reality.. and in saying that accepts the objectivity of realizing the subjectivity of the human reality.. then truth is lost in the abscurity of this paradox and creationism and evolution are already one.
To further probe my own standpoint.. that contradicts what brought me here.. is the necessity of tolerance.. what if there sprung a third objective belief.. that incorporated creationism and evolution.. this world doesn't need another scientology.. and to fall back on what brought me to this forums.. is the feeling that everything i hate about mankind's condition is a result of forums like this, not the forum itself but the grouping of people discussing abstract reality..
but to refute that with the reveleation you helped me to attain.. a revelation that i only verbalized because i already knew it(some mysticism for you) my true problem is the coming to a conclusion and this forum is evolving.. not towards a definite end.. that.. is where religion's creaitonism went wrong in my opinion, evolution has claimed no end.. has creationism in itself? im a little ignorant
windin up?

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by iano, posted 04-21-2006 8:10 PM TheFonziszen has not replied
 Message 228 by Malachi-II, posted 04-22-2006 7:04 AM TheFonziszen has not replied

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 225 of 231 (305806)
04-21-2006 9:14 PM


OK
"I haven't fully read through what you wrote. It's late and I'm off to bed. But on this one snippet let me ask you if you could point out any objective belief, never mind 3 of them."
an objective belief.. you ask me that as if objective beliefs dont exist, or if im using some sort of oxymoron?
Creationism is objective, evolution is objective, the idea of merging creationism with evolution and forming a union by educating people in both, and the advantages of both; teaching the educational value in creationism and evolution, evolutionism if you will... would be the third objective belief. if you need further elaboration i will cooperate but just read more thoroughly or open a dictionary

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 229 of 231 (305918)
04-22-2006 12:22 PM


Respect
quote:
I must have picked up someone’s message on this forum and got sucked in. I should have joined a philosophical debate. On the other hand, as I said to AdminNosy, ”I’m not a single celled entity.’ No human being I have actually met is either.
Good philosophy isn't debateable. By your comment, "im not a single celled entity," well.. that just throws me off completely.. i have too much respect for your sarcasm and implications to denounce you for the statement.. so ill just say that the first traces of life were single celled.. but be real, that statement is obsurd and so is the proclamation that follows.
quote:
The greatest revolution of our generation is the discovery that human beings, by changing the inner attitudes of their minds, can change the outer aspects of their lives.
If you are preparing to write a paper on existentialism I strongly advise you to invest in a dictionary or spell checker
I appreciate the concern for my writing, you have also offered concern you offered earlier for my 'depression.' I always do use a dictionary, and a spell checker when i write scholarly but i havent been paying much attention to it for these purposes.. i figure this is more conversational writing where the thoughts and ideas can flow from my social being aswell as my intellect.. without someone marking up my misspellings in red, but you've been very apathetic and i note that.
quote:
You end that paragraph by saying the universe is evolving.. separately. Separate from what?
For that statement im struggling to reword myself and like you C&E united i will just keep the purpose of it for myself, it was in response to the idea that man is the center of the universe, and that our actions affect the cosmos or are intertwined with some sort of universal evolution.
I am willing to agree with those statements for the sake of argument, but i am skeptical about all explanations of the sort, and for good reason, we make mistakes and overlook facts. Also i never said i agree with evolution.. in fact the entire theory of evolution and the big bang is based on our perception of time, mull that over for a moment.
I appreciate your insights and how you respectfully see a similiarlity between me and a teenage friend of yours. Perhaps that is because i am 17 and debate with the same sort of confident convition that she uses? But if age is a fallacy for you then i cannot offer you the same respect that you have been addressing me with.
With a final thought..
quote:
I agree that our thoughts and actions profoundly affect the ecological environment of planet Earth, and possibly in the solar system to a degree
I do not even need to ask weither you agree with the conservative radicals who have blamed the hurricane that hit New Orleans on the fact that the city was infested by many a gay, black and socially inferiors. But that kind of affect is what really gets to me. People, in large numbers believe in their own imaginations and the effects their thoughts have on the physical world.
quote:
I am simply, and perhaps simplistically, questioning whether our efforts will have an lasting effect on the grinding evolutionary process.
Now think about this, what if the thing we call evolution is not a purely physical change, in fact we know it is not just biological adaptation, early breeds of homosapian's evolved into using tools, and later they learned how to use more and more aspects of their environment to help them survive. So if we are no longer physically evolving(though we are genetically changing, traits and what not) then our culture is evolving, can we agree? So to ask these questions about forming into energy is to be longsighted, the only step we can forsee in evolution is the final one, where pain is obsolete. Culturally we're still living out of packs.. it is primal.. still fighting for the planet though our species has already won it.. My language will sure to be "depressed" if i continue so i will save myself from your apathy.. but mull it.
Also im sorry you feel conn'd but i feel a little unclean.
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 04-22-2006 11:27 AM

TheFonziszen
Inactive Member


Message 230 of 231 (305984)
04-22-2006 5:15 PM


Penultimate bullshit
quote:
If you are preparing to write a paper on existentialism I strongly advise you to invest in a dictionary or spell checker. In the penultimate paragraph of your message 219 you wrote the word ”definantly’. You may have meant definitely or defiantly. The latter seems to reflect your attitude of mind.
Lets not be TOO superficial.. and if you are going to offer to be my spellcheck.. atleast do it when appropriate and make it correct.. double check your own suggestions.. the "penultimate" paragraph that i think you made reference to i use the word definite.. to define a "definite" end, definantly was a typo, that, like your young friend, is understandable.. and defiantly is not a synonym to either of those words and is irrelevent except to point out your silly pun to label my state of mind.. which has progressed from depression to defiance.. appreciated.. duly noted

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024