Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why DID we evolve into humans?
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 231 (44103)
06-25-2003 7:05 AM


quote:
why did we need to evolve into humans (if you believe that we did). what do apes NOT have that they needed to become humans - and if it is they needed ability to talk - why did they just not have voice boxes as they are now - if it is because they wanted to walk upright - why?!
Thought I'd pick up on this. As others have pointed out, there is no "intent" driving evolution, it is merely random accident, more or less.
Humans are a "plains ape". There are apes that live in forests and jungles etc; we just happened to come from a line specialised for savannahs, probably (which coincides nicely with the Out Of Africa hypothesis). It was a good and useful developement; putting the sight organs as high as possible extends the range of vision and alertness. Vertical walking is quite efficient over long distances, and quite useful over short distances becuase we can shift our balance point. [ A human can beat a horse over 100 meters, if its broken into two 50m stretches; the horse loses time taking the corner]
Communication is just plain Useful among any socially structire animal. Gelada baboons exchnage a hell of a lot of vocalisation, and show some other interesting features; becuase they spend a lot of time parked on their butts pulling up grass, sexual displays appear to have moved to the chest, in a manner analogous especially with human females.
The cetaceans, of course, are famous for large volumes of communications. I heard some orcas in a fjord in Norway last year by hydrophone - the sheer volume of data they are exchanging is absolutely staggering, there is a non-stop layer of continual chatter.
Communication is evolutionarily beneficial; it is independantly "invented" by many organisms. Our upright stance is odd, but we can understand the evolutionary benefits. And we know that there were benefits, becuase humans come 3rd on the European carnivore guild, after cave bears and lions (in that order) and before wolves. Thats not bad going considering we have so few natural weapons.

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 115 of 231 (133128)
08-12-2004 7:00 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by crashfrog
08-10-2004 12:42 PM


quote:
If you cut the tails off of rats, it doesn't matter how many rats you do it to, for how long - none of their offspring are born without tails.
Do we know that for sure? Lets do it for a thousand years and then see.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by crashfrog, posted 08-10-2004 12:42 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by jar, posted 08-12-2004 8:37 AM contracycle has replied
 Message 118 by NosyNed, posted 08-12-2004 12:01 PM contracycle has not replied
 Message 119 by crashfrog, posted 08-12-2004 12:11 PM contracycle has not replied
 Message 124 by coffee_addict, posted 09-14-2004 12:44 AM contracycle has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 117 of 231 (133150)
08-12-2004 9:34 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by jar
08-12-2004 8:37 AM


Fair point.
Although, wheat is a grass that has been substantially modified by its coexistance with humanity. Now, I'm not suggesting that Lamarckism is right, I guess the case can be made that the human intervention merely creates a probabalistic space into which evolution can design, as it were.
This message has been edited by contracycle, 08-12-2004 08:39 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by jar, posted 08-12-2004 8:37 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Gary, posted 08-12-2004 8:21 PM contracycle has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 231 (162833)
11-24-2004 3:56 AM


This "muscle memory" is also a major factor in martial arts; well, its present in all physical activities but martial artists are conscious of it. Dancers are too to a lesser extent. I'm wary of thinking this is a high-level intellectual function, though, becuase I'd expect it to be part of ther learning process of nearly all animals.

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Ben!, posted 11-24-2004 10:41 AM contracycle has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024