Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   We're Really Chimps???
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6049 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 56 of 92 (177845)
01-17-2005 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Juhrahnimo
01-17-2005 9:43 AM


Punishment is a good word for it
God had made LOADS of animals and brought them all to ADAM and he named each one. Seems to me that God was setting up the world to suit Adam, sort of like when we "set up" our kids' bedrooms or playrooms to be "fun" environments.
So what was God thinking when He created the candiru fish for Adam to "play" with?
The candiru is a small, blood-eating catfish that swims up the urethra of humans, and then deploys spines to irremovably lodge itself in the urethra and draw blood. The pain is immense to the point that some males resort to amputation of the penis to stop the pain. In others, the pain the candiru induces results in shock and death.
What a "fun" environment with great "companions" to play with!
I think the candiru points to an idea previously brought up in this thread - that its designer is necessarily cruel or stupid if "man" is the favored species.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-17-2005 9:43 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-17-2005 12:50 PM pink sasquatch has replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6049 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 58 of 92 (177856)
01-17-2005 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Juhrahnimo
01-17-2005 12:50 PM


give the fruit bats scurvy
But for certain, God didn't make thorns and thistles as part of the creation either, but they showed up later for the reason mentioned... We did that.
I'm glad to know I had a part in the creation of thorns and thistles.
So, everything bad in the world is Man's fault. Or more specifically, "first man's" fault. (Again seems like a God punishing an entire planet for one man's mistake is not such a nice God.)
But to go back to the GLO gene - by your account Adam's best bud Skippy the Chimp was sitting next to him at lunch when Adam got zapped by the God's anti-GLO ray. Skippy's mutation was just collateral damage (shouldn't God have better aim?).
Then what about guinea pigs and fruit bats? They both have non-functional GLO genes, but with different mutations than humans and chimps. How does God making guinea pigs and fruit bats scurvy-prone fit into your story?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-17-2005 12:50 PM Juhrahnimo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024