Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   We're Really Chimps???
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 26 of 92 (177594)
01-16-2005 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by TheLiteralist
01-16-2005 2:34 PM


Re: Can we assume the Creator's motives in design?
But hold on your Blind man quote is nothing at all to do with the "eye problem" - that person was born blind. How is that related to the relative merit of our eyes against other animals?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by TheLiteralist, posted 01-16-2005 2:34 PM TheLiteralist has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 31 of 92 (177647)
01-16-2005 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Juhrahnimo
01-16-2005 7:58 PM


Re: Folds, errors, etc?
quote:
Sorry, I was just being facetious to make a point. I probably shouldn't have done that. It's the part about how much apes resemble man, but yet evilutionists have no clue what the apes evolved from (AND no evidence whatsoever despite their sputtering about fossil evidence). I'll be more serious in the future.
"Junk" DNA has become a laughable term, yes indeed. And I predicted this would happen, along with many other Christians (and even NON-Christians!). Evilutionists used to spout the idea of "junk" DNA and that our God must be STUPID if he made something that contained so much USELESS stuff. No matter what we said, the scientists still claimed that MOST of DNA was JUNK and had no purpose. Well, all that has CHANGED recently! What a surprise! They have found JUNK DNA plays a VERY important role after all! And now the evilutionists are acting like this is an incredible discovery and they're even making a big deal out of "discovering" this! Unlike the Bible, their scientific theories continue to change.
If you want to "more serious in future" and have people actually consider your posts in good faith, you many want to use the correct spelling of Evolutionist.
quote:
Unlike the Bible, their scientific theories continue to change.
Em...yes?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 01-16-2005 20:04 AM
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 01-16-2005 20:05 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-16-2005 7:58 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-16-2005 8:18 PM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024