I do apologise. I thought the one sentence would make the point. Obviously it didn't and I assume responsibilty for not expanding on the statement.
I will try again. As there is no physical evidence of a god, I was making a point that god could be female. In the time of jesus, it was under patriarchal rule (still is) and the impression of a creator would naturally be that of a male. Just because the people of the era believed god to be male does not prove that she is.
OK jar replacement
I must say I am bemused by this response.
OK jar replacement
™ Version 4.2
