Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cdesign proponentist troll recruiting center
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 88 of 107 (589541)
11-03-2010 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by frako
11-03-2010 8:23 AM


Re: Final exam questions
But you forget that they do not need any kind of internal consistency. They feel free to believe many different and mutually contradictory things. Just so long as it's not what science says!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by frako, posted 11-03-2010 8:23 AM frako has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 99 of 107 (589863)
11-04-2010 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Dawn Bertot
11-04-2010 10:28 AM


Re: Suggestion
Whisky, Tango, Foxtrot, Oscar?
{my emphasis}
What exacally does the totality of evolution predict that is different than IDs methodology
. . .
Instead if repeading what I asked you, perhaps you could give me an example that is different than IDs methods. Since the scientific method is superior.
So what predictions does evo make and how are its basic scientific methods different than IDs, to make it more acceptable
ID has methods? ID has a methodology??? Whatever is it?!?!?!
We have repeated asked, pleaded with you, to tell us what ID's methodology is, or even to tell us whether it even has a methodology. And in response you refused to enlighten us in your own inimitable way (decrying as idiots everybody who tries to make sense our of your incomprehensible blathering).
Well, now that you finally state that there does exist an ID methodology and even insist that we compare it to the scientific method, you no longer have any excuse. Now you must present the ID methodology.
So, present it! Just exactly how are we supposed to objectively and reliably detect and determine design?
Edited by dwise1, : Just exactly how are we supposed to objectively and reliably detect and determine design?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-04-2010 10:28 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024