Well, clearly you are not able to defend your position on your own, you need these writers and authors to help you, so ill follow you down your bunny trail.
My position is that no scientist is using ID to do scientific research. If there were scientists using ID then you would be able to point me to ID based research papers in peer reviewed journals.
Since there is no ID science there is nothing scientific to debate. It really is that simple.
tell me out of the authors, journals, papers, volumes, etc, what i am missing, what types of tests and experimentation do i need to conduct, that is NOT already described in the research, by Id i desribed in that other post
It is your job to describe the research programs needed to test ID and then present that research to the scientific community. That is how science works. It doesn't work by challenging scientists to debate theology.
IOWs could you explain why the DETAILS of thier research, establish any better the general principles of evidence concerning evolution verses design
Because that is how science works. Go to
http://www.pubmed.com . Search for phylogenomics. Pick a paper. Read it. That is the kind of detail I am asking for, the kind of detail a real scientific theory would be able to produce.