Hi ICANT,
I thought you wasn't talking to me.
You shouldn't think that. Maybe in one thread due to you not willing to see further than your perspective, but certainly not overall.
We cool...we always cool
You don't know how it began to exist but you can still declare how it did not begin to exist.
Again, I'm saying there is no point to begin from. In other words, there was never
nothing and then
suddenly something.
You are the only one declaring that it began from a state of nothingness. You cannot show evidence for that nor can you describe nothingness. It's a nonsensical concept.
Life began to exist in Genesis 1:1 so if you want to prove Genesis 1:1 false you would need to present the evidence for how it began to exist.
Nonsense. You're already coming into that with the view that Genesis is right.
Tell you what, describe how "life" began using Genesis as your guild. See how far you can get into describing the origin of the first cellular life using the Bible. If you come close to what the current evidence (scientific) shows, then I'll concede.
However, note that life is not described as beginning with a man and a woman, which is how the Bible states it. How do you get around that?
Just don't tell me Genesis 1:1 has been proven false until your metaphysics becomes science.
There's no metaphysics in the study of abiogenesis, and the fact that we are as close as we are to creating cellular life shows that it is possible.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.