Are Fundamentalists Inherently Immoral

Is it morally wrong because the bible says it's wrong, or because Suzy might not be a big fan?

---

It's not the man that knows the most that has the most to say.

Do cloud not exist because one can not define the boarders? We don't make absolute claims except within what we, individually, believe to be right and wrong. I say don't rape Suzy because I suspect that she and I are equivalent beings in that we are both sovereign, sentient and conscious. I value these properties in myself and, therefore, assume them valuable in Suzy. It's kind of like a mushroom: Better to assume it's poisonous; major benifit if your right; minor cost if you're wrong. If you can't get exactly 32 psi in your tires do you just rip em' off and roll around on the rims? We, mankind, don't have to get it exactly right to recognize the benefit of trying. Clearly we have that going for us. Did you know that some people, like, 3000 years ago wrote a book about Him that makes Him out to be a real douche-bag? You should set the record straight and let everyone know God is, like, cool, and wouldn't rape Suzy. Speak for yourself, John. So far it's fundamentalism which is depraved at its very core. In our little poll it's come back with abstentions and a "Not unless she's asking for it".

---

It's not the man that knows the most that has the most to say.

I do know the Bible. That is why I know that God is imaginary or insane. But as we have a dozen other pretenders to the throne, and they can't be all real, I pick imaginary. Either way

---

It's not the man that knows the most that has the most to say.