My evidence is both consistent, self evident and rational. It is the first chapter of Genesis which clearly and unequivocally states that God created the heavens and the earth and all life upon it by the word of His mouth. It was a supernatural act and therefore cannot be proven according to human standards of science, nor does it need to be since we see the results of His spoken word in the very creation which you refuse to give Him credit for creating in love. Balls in your court now...
Your "evidence" is actually religious belief masquerading as evidence (see tagline).
Your arguments are nothing more than religious apologetics.
And this is the science forum; religious belief and apologetics by themselves are insufficient. You need to include evidence to support any such beliefs, or perhaps you should take your arguments to a more appropriate forum. There are many such on this website.
Or as Ned suggests, perhaps you could offer us an overview of your interpretation--explaining all relevant scientific evidence.
But remember, not all interpretations are equal. You should admit that, knowing that there are some 4,000 world religions with perhaps 40,000 subdivisions or sects. Surely you don't consider all 40,000 interpretations equally valid?
So if you are presenting an interpretation purporting to be science, remember that, unlike religion, it will be subjected to testing against empirical evidence.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2