Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
65 online now:
Dredge, dwise1, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), nwr (4 members, 61 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,038 Year: 4,150/6,534 Month: 364/900 Week: 70/150 Day: 1/42 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Meyer's Hopeless Monster
trisha 
Suspended Junior Member (Idle past 3820 days)
Posts: 5
Joined: 09-01-2011


Message 203 of 207 (631468)
09-01-2011 6:49 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nic Tamzek
08-25-2004 9:56 PM


Meyer's paper predictably follows the same pattern that has characterized "intelligent design" since its inception: deny the sufficiency of evolutionary processes to account for life's history and diversity, then assert that an "intelligent designer" provides a better explanation. Although ID is discussed in the concluding section of the paper, there is no positive account of "intelligent design" presented, just as in all previous work on "intelligent design". Just as a detective doesn't have a case against someone without motive, means, and opportunity, ID doesn't stand a scientific chance without some kind of model of what happened, how, and why. Only a reasonably detailed model could provide explanatory hypotheses that can be empirically tested. "An unknown intelligent designer did something, somewhere, somehow, for no apparent reason" is not a model.

funny photos

Edited by Admin, : Spamify link.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nic Tamzek, posted 08-25-2004 9:56 PM Nic Tamzek has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by Robert Byers, posted 09-07-2011 2:13 AM trisha has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022