Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transitional fossils and quote mining
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 210 (524525)
09-17-2009 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Hyroglyphx
09-17-2009 9:36 AM


minor quibble
The terms "micro" or "macroevolution" are meaningless terms to science and is simply an attempt to confuse laymen who don't understand the depth of the evidence stacked against them.
When I took this class, oh... back in 2001 or so, the biology book we used did go into micro and macro evolution as legitimate scientific concepts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-17-2009 9:36 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-17-2009 10:27 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 210 (524528)
09-17-2009 10:35 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Hyroglyphx
09-17-2009 10:27 AM


Re: minor quibble
When I took this class, oh... back in 2001 or so, the biology book we used did go into micro and macro evolution as legitimate scientific concepts.
At any time was it used to deny the whole of evolution?
No, of course not. But it wasn't meaningless and it wasn't an attempt to confuse laymen.
I just wanted to let you know that you were mistaken with the whole micro and macro thing not being scientific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-17-2009 10:27 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-17-2009 1:03 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024