Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8942 total)
29 online now:
AZPaul3, PaulK, ssope, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat), vimesey (5 members, 24 visitors)
Newest Member: John Sullivan
Post Volume: Total: 863,624 Year: 18,660/19,786 Month: 1,080/1,705 Week: 332/518 Day: 8/88 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transitional fossils and quote mining
jacortina
Member (Idle past 3370 days)
Posts: 64
Joined: 08-07-2009


Message 8 of 210 (523915)
09-13-2009 9:34 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Arphy
09-13-2009 7:14 AM


Why do you think that being a bird somehow eliminates Archy from consideration from being transitional? Aside from the strawman view of transitionals made clear by the moronic 'half and half' description.

You first assume evolution and then see if you can make it fit.

Testing a hypothesis means using that hypothesis to make predictions. If descent with modification is true, then there has to have been species with features of both ancestral forms and later derived forms, some of which which should be found. Note 'half-and-half' is not what is predicted nor is it required. Whether it's considered a bird with many saurian features or a birdlike dinosaur, Archy is clearly an example of what that part of the theory of evolution predicts should be found.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Arphy, posted 09-13-2009 7:14 AM Arphy has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019