Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 89 (8993 total)
60 online now:
Coragyps, jar, kjsimons, NosyNed (AdminNosy), PaulK, PurpleYouko (6 members, 54 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,054 Year: 10,802/23,288 Month: 56/1,761 Week: 24/387 Day: 7/17 Hour: 1/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Transitional fossils and quote mining
JonF
Member
Posts: 6158
Joined: 06-23-2003
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 205 of 210 (532751)
10-26-2009 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by Arphy
10-26-2009 4:38 AM


Re: How Arphy Stays On Topic: Yet another example of quote mining
So they finally found a dating method that also agrees with their biostratigraphic evidence (or at least as it stands at the moment)? Somehow I'm not impressed.

Yeah, agreement between independent methods of measuring something is meaningless, right?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by Arphy, posted 10-26-2009 4:38 AM Arphy has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020