Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   EVOLUTION'S FRAUD HAS CONTRIBUTED TO ITS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE:
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 36 of 323 (524733)
09-18-2009 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Archangel
09-18-2009 8:29 AM


Archangel writes:
For example, ApostateAbe offers up this series of ape skulls from T.O. and attempts to pass them off as different evolutionary steps of what became we human beings:
(And then, after the picture)
The assumption is ridiculous as all they have in support that these skulls represent evolutionary ancestors at all are the skulls themselves. But no evidence that these aren't just examples of extinct Apes?
Thanks for clearing that up Archy, you just called a skull from a Homo Sapiens (Skull N) an "apeskull". So, you agree that modern humans are apes. Thanks, that should take some confusion away.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Archangel, posted 09-18-2009 8:29 AM Archangel has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by greyseal, posted 09-18-2009 10:25 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 60 of 323 (524827)
09-19-2009 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Archangel
09-19-2009 9:09 AM


Archangel writes:
So let me repeat it for you. I am above all other primates/lower animals on Earth. Maybe the reason why you and I can't relate to each other or understand each other is because "YOU" are directly related to apes, but I am NOT!!! I am a human being who was created in my father Gods image, by Him, for fellowship, and I am NOT the result of evolution from lower animals. So stop attempting to define me with your degrading and offensive perspective that human beings are just more complex animals, because I am much more than that with my personal awareness of MY Heavenly Father/Creator/God as well as my ability and desire to fellowship with Him. Degrade yourself and your proper place in this world if you like, but don't place me in that degrading box with you.
Hey, you're the one that said humans are apes. Don't remember? Read your own Message 31 again, where you call all skulls in the picture (including a modern human skull, skull N.) "APEskulls"
So, according to your very own words, humans are APES.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 9:09 AM Archangel has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 66 of 323 (524836)
09-19-2009 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by ApostateAbe
09-19-2009 12:25 PM


Re: What is fraud? Let's review the FACTS
ApostateAbe writes:
RAZD, good Lord. Did you get permission from your publisher to put a copy of your book on the Internet?
That's his normal posting style. I'm sure he's glad you like it.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by ApostateAbe, posted 09-19-2009 12:25 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 80 of 323 (524907)
09-20-2009 2:23 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Archangel
09-19-2009 9:09 PM


Re: Neanderthals are apes?
Archangel writes:
No one has any actual or absolute evidence at all that neanderthal's are anything more than lower animals which is precisely what they were.
Then why in Message 1 did you say they are:
Archangel in message 1 writes:
Still synonymous with brutishness, the first Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets.
(emphasis mine)
What is it Archy? Just as human as us, or lower animals? Pick something and admit that you were wrong on one account. I think the fact that you're not answering these questions says enough.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 9:09 PM Archangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Archangel, posted 09-20-2009 3:50 AM Huntard has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 82 of 323 (524912)
09-20-2009 4:01 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Archangel
09-20-2009 3:50 AM


Re: Neanderthals are apes?
Archangel writes:
As is quite obvious to any reasonable observer, I wasn't posting that info for the truth of it in any way, but was posting it as evidence of the ludicrous claims this fraudulent science continues to make regarding the status of these bones of extinct primates which this pseudo science wants to now define as being relatives/close relatives of ours.
So, you were posting something you know wasn't true. That's called lying. Also, you were lying to further your cause, that's very disingenuous of you. But thanks for letting everybody know you are willing to lie to further your cause.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Archangel, posted 09-20-2009 3:50 AM Archangel has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 117 of 323 (525107)
09-21-2009 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Archangel
09-21-2009 2:07 PM


Re: God complex
Archangel writes:
To be specific, Planck's time was prior to this alleged big bang some theorized occurred 14.5 billion years ago according to cosmological estimates, which actually place it somewhere between 10 and 20 billion years ago.
I know this is off topic here, but this is just plain wrong Archy. Planck time wasn't before the big bang, it was between T=0 (the actual "big bang", which occurred to current understanding about 14.5 billion years ago) and T=10-43.
That's quite a margin of error range for such a precise science, don't you think?
It would be if it were true.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Archangel, posted 09-21-2009 2:07 PM Archangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Archangel, posted 09-21-2009 7:54 PM Huntard has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 171 of 323 (525342)
09-23-2009 1:51 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Archangel
09-22-2009 8:58 PM


Re: "True" science and other evolution fantasies:
I'm glad you finally say you're not interested in science Archy, for this:
Archangel writes:
IF EVOLUTION WAS A TRUE SCIENCE THAT WAS TRULY SUPPORTED BY SCIENTIFIC FACT, THEN IT WOULDN'T CONFLICT WITH THE GENESIS ACCOUNT.
Is of course the classic case of assuming the conclusion before studying the facts. Genesis must be true, that is your conclusion. Whatever contradicts that, must be false. That's not "true" science, that's pseudo-science.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Archangel, posted 09-22-2009 8:58 PM Archangel has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 188 of 323 (525424)
09-23-2009 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by Archangel
09-23-2009 10:05 AM


Archangel writes:
WHICH THIS ALLEGED EVIDENCE OF THE "Archaeoraptor" WAS. AS WERE ALL OF THE OTHER FRAUDS I HAVE DISCUSSED HERE WERE PEER REVIEWED AND RUBBER STAMPED FROM WITHIN THE EVOLUTION COMMUNITY.
No, they weren't. NG is a popular science magazine, and is not, I repeat, NOT peer reviewed.
"Archaeoraptor" is actually being defended by evolutionists on other threads in this very forum as we speak.
So, you don't know the difference between archaeopterix and archeoraptor. Yet you're supposed to know better than the rest of us....Right....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Archangel, posted 09-23-2009 10:05 AM Archangel has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 198 of 323 (525503)
09-23-2009 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Archangel
09-23-2009 3:11 PM


Archangel writes:
I mean, have you no problem with 50 million year old fossils being found with large portions of their soft tissue still intact as I show in post #180?
Since this is not true, not really, no.
Will every post you all write be rife with denials and excuses rather than actual evidence which deals with the facts regarding these many frauds which define this pseudo science?
If you would actually post some, perhaps...

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Archangel, posted 09-23-2009 3:11 PM Archangel has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 216 of 323 (525641)
09-24-2009 4:35 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by Arphy
09-24-2009 4:23 AM


Arphy writes:
Same with Neanderthal man. The image of an ape-ish looking person i would say is still in the public mind. Despite scientists refuting this image of neanderthals this has not had a big impact on the public impression of neanderthals.
So you're saying Neadrthals were more huamn like than ape like, yes?

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Arphy, posted 09-24-2009 4:23 AM Arphy has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 264 of 323 (525953)
09-25-2009 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 255 by dokukaeru
09-25-2009 8:10 AM


dokukaeru writes:
One last thing: Is your posting here on EVC in any way related to a class you may be taking?
This I can answer fairly confidently. No, he's from another forum where others who post here are also posting. (4fomrus I believe). I posted there myself for some time, and Archy basically posts the same way there as he has over here. But since the moderation there isn't nearly as strict as it is here, I left there, since there's no point when no one is forced to stay on topic or to debate in good faith.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 255 by dokukaeru, posted 09-25-2009 8:10 AM dokukaeru has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 290 of 323 (526211)
09-26-2009 7:53 AM
Reply to: Message 289 by Archangel
09-26-2009 7:34 AM


Re: Another failure by RAZD
Archangel writes:
You are being dishonest again RAZD. No journalist sat down and came up with this rendition on his word processor and published it for public consumption. It was created by some paleontologist based on the actual bones from available specimens and released to the media for public consumption.
I'm assuming you have evidence for this claim? So, provide evidence that this was drawn by a paleontologist, or retract your claim.

I hunt for the truth
I am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping hand
My image is of agony, my servants rape the land
Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain
Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name
Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law
My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore.
-Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by Archangel, posted 09-26-2009 7:34 AM Archangel has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024