RAZD, for example, has went to GREAT lengths to refute ALL of your claims, 2 or more times, extremely eloquently. You just fail to: a) realize it or B) understand what he is saying since you say things like:
Notice how this allegedly scientific thesis with all of its scientific jargon......
shows you are in over your head and don't understand enough "scientific jargon" to have a valid opinion. Would you take my words serious if I said something like "well that jeebus fellar ain't real cuz i caynt understand them jews and the way they talk. If they wasn't telling lies, theyd talk so's I could understand 'em"
You have had your claims slammed to the ground by someone showing you how either a) science showed it was wrong and admitted mistake...LONG ago (while you and other Creo's hold onto the same story as if science still believes it to be a backbone of Evolution or b) a non-scientist purported the claim, and you and other creo's still hold onto it as if science believes it as a backbone of Evolution.
Let me ask you this: YOU, Archangle, somehow become a defendant in a homicide case. The case against you is almost insurmountable: how can you prove you were innocent? DNA? Blood samples? fingerprints? or would you just hope god shows the heathen justice system in a miracle?
How about all of these convicts who have been locked up for decades, only to finally be set free due to DNA evidence, proving them to have been wrongly convicted. These same methods are used today in Evolution.
Go ahead and look at that graph again there Arch. You see that little segment in yellow, with words? Yes, the one that says "THIS IS THE ONLY SEGMENT COVERED BY ORGANIC EVOLUTION"? Does that segment include abiogenesis?
Lets just point out here where paleogeneticists ADMITTED they had made some mistakes in the early stages of the field, where present day DNA were intermixed with DNA found. What did they do? Did they stick with the false positives and tell the public, while keeping secret the mistakes they made? No. They modified the science in order to maintain its integrity. Whereas, sites like creation.com continue to use finds that science itself has refuted and ADMITTED mistake.
It is you, and your ilk that are the fraudsters, dear sir.