Pseudoskepticism and logic

In message 111... ...RAZD is refusing to take a position on if he thinks your evidence exists. While I think this is a debating tactic of false ignorance (or something like that), I guess it does mean that you do need to lay the "God delusion" type information/evidence on him.Adminnemooseusps: There is a (sort of) side discussion relating to this topic at the "Coffee House" "Peanut Gallery" topic. It starts here. And in case anyone doesn't already know - Full disclosure - Minnemooseus is in an opposition position to that of RAZD.

...then you should also have some on-topic material in your message.Rrhains message is on shaky ground - Your message is flat out worthless.Going to hide the none on-topic part.Adminnemooseus

Topic got quite stinky at the end.Adminnemooseus