Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
536 online now:
dwise1, jar, kjsimons, nwr, PaulK (5 members, 531 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,237 Year: 4,349/6,534 Month: 563/900 Week: 87/182 Day: 21/38 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How creationism explains babies with tails
anglagard
Member (Idle past 73 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 59 of 59 (615631)
05-15-2011 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Caleb
05-14-2011 10:06 PM


Re: Just Some Thoughts
Caleb writes:

However, what I said about the tail not being very useful to monkeys, humans, or their "common ancestor" still applies.

Please feel free to look up the term prehensile tail and let me know why the term 'new world monkey' does not apply to the term monkey.

And yes I did my research. Do you think it is correct now or did a mess up again?

To be generous, woefully incomplete.


The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
— Salman Rushdie

This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen


This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Caleb, posted 05-14-2011 10:06 PM Caleb has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022