Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 67 (9078 total)
640 online now:
nwr, PaulK, Tanypteryx, Theodoric (4 members, 636 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,151 Year: 5,263/6,534 Month: 106/577 Week: 94/80 Day: 12/49 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How creationism explains babies with tails
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3881
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 4.0


Message 22 of 59 (596608)
12-15-2010 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Granny Magda
12-15-2010 10:57 AM


We're back to considerations of human tails
Looking back at ApostateAbe's message 1, I'm not that enthused about its quality. AA concluded that message with:

But of course the most important factor is the evidence. The tails with vertebral segments, skin and organized muscle--that you have seen in the Bergman study, the Bar-Maor study and more--cannot be explained by a mere duplication mistake. After all, they are the same tails that we were conceived with.

So, is this recent discussion severely undermining AA's message 1 position?

Moose


This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Granny Magda, posted 12-15-2010 10:57 AM Granny Magda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Granny Magda, posted 12-16-2010 12:16 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022