Looking back at ApostateAbe's message 1, I'm not that enthused about its quality. AA concluded that message with:
But of course the most important factor is the evidence. The tails with vertebral segments, skin and organized muscle--that you have seen in the Bergman study, the Bar-Maor study and more--cannot be explained by a mere duplication mistake. After all, they are the same tails that we were conceived with.
So, is this recent discussion severely undermining AA's message 1 position?