No I am not saying that. My argument is not against a designer. My argument is against using homology as proof of a designer.
Because a function of life is reproduction, homologies in life are not characteristic of intention. Inanimate things like shoes and cars can ONLY be created and thus their homologies ARE characeristics of intention. That is why analogies of life to inanimate things such as cars fail.
I am not trying to disprove a designer. That is impossible. I have only shown that the argument of design via homology is a failed argument.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)