Let me quote myself and add the requisite emphasis for you, "Find me one clinical study, that's been done by a
reputable source, and
can be repeated, and you might begin to change my mind. Stop believing everything you hear. There are absolutely no studies that vindicate amygdalin's use."
You don't even have to find a study that's been performed in the US. I know amygdalin is able to be prescribed in various other countries. Are there any international teams that have published studies that verify amygdalin's supposed abilities?
You finding a "whistle-blower" doesn't seem to be much of a basis for your claims. The anectdotal evidence is no basis for any such claim. The lack of any corroborating evidence tells me that amygdalin, at this point in time, is not a remedy for any form of cancer, nor has it been shown to prevent cancer. When you find something that is not innuendo, and have actual, tangible proof you'll have something to talk about. Up until that point, amygdalin is nothing more than a folk remedy which is on par with snake oil.
And the Ignorant shall fall to the Squirrels - Chip 2:54