Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
98 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Tangle (2 members, 96 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,045 Year: 5,157/6,534 Month: 0/577 Week: 68/135 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Feature: Message Rating System
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(3)
Message 229 of 258 (763462)
07-25-2015 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by Admin
07-24-2015 9:43 PM


I did some checking myself and me having a persistent '10' rating is a feature, rather than a bug.

I would leave it as it is or you may bork the whole message board.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Admin, posted 07-24-2015 9:43 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by Admin, posted 07-26-2015 8:57 PM Larni has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022