Living fossils expose evolution

What's your excuse for this?

Didn't you see this? Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

Do you understand that showing animals in stasis, that have not evolved much lately, doesn't really say anything about all the other animals that have been evolving?

Try this:

Once again:So what? Morphological stasis is no problem for the Theory of Evolution.oh yeah, and there's this still: Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

I mean: "What the hell does that have to do with it? You need to say more to have a point." Don't waste your time. A lack of evolutionary change in living fossils is not a problem for the Theory of Evolution.The ToE does not necessitate that creatures constantly change. If one fits well in a particular niche, then there'd be no selective pressure to change it. Look at crocodiles, they fit great where they are and haven't changed much at all. I'm guessing in a museum somewhere. So what?That means, what's your point here? Please provide more information. Asking where the fossils are is not a point? Do you doubt that they exist? Do you know what the Gish Gallop is? you can Google it. Gradually. Look at Amphibeans. Some of them can get oxygen from both air and water. Look at the Lungfish. Its a fish that can gulp oxygen from air. Before it left the water. I don't know the specifics of the evolution of mammary glands, but it doesn't really matter. Pointing out some thing that has yet to be fully explained doesn't help your cause in this thread.Maybe you could start here:http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/...nal/112611667/abstract What a simple mischaracterization of evolution. There were populations and populations of land animals of which some gradually evolved to be partially land and partially marine over long periods of time before some of them began to gradully evolve into fully marine.You seem to have some gross misunderstandings of the way the Theory of Evolution postulates evolution happening. Very slowly, across many populations of many generation. Go on failing to make your point? No, please stop wasting bandwidth. In the OP you wrote:

quote:

---

The most damaging thing to evolution about this is that there are no transitionals either before or after this bat. Other species have been found of course, but none reveal any change either from another organism or a change into something else.

---

I show you a picture of whale evolution and its just a joke. How convenient.

They gradually evolved over many many generations, with intermediate steps in between. It wasn't a single point, and there are many intermediates that could exist both in and out of the water, but the ability to breathe oxygen was before it ascended to dry land.