Concerning the 1st Law of Thermo. Who should we believe: virtually every science textbook in the last 100 yrs which tells us that matter can neither be created nor destroyed or individuals like you who think you can magically whip up matter?
So you appeal to science and it's 100 years of textbooks, asking "who should we believe science or [cavediver]?", but yet reject 100 years of texbook when it comes to evolutionary biology?
Then you appeal to the reverse, saying that we shouldn't believe the textbooks and listen to you when we're talking about evolutionary biology?
So what, you just pick and choose what you like in the textbooks and use it as evidence only when it supports your belief, but reject the textbooks when it doesn't support your belief?
This doesn't seem like a very honest approach, Calypsis. Why do you appeal to science when it benefits you but reject it when it doesn't?
Shouldn't the questions you have about living cells be answered by the authorities in this field (no matter what their answer may be), and not holy books? The same as you seem to be doing for 1Lot mind you.