National Geographic called it a true missing link in the complex chain that connects dinosaurs to birds.
they are only reporting on what they are being told i assume...so who told them that it was a true missing link? I dont know who told them but when i read a science journal i'd like to think its full of truthful and accurate information.
National Geographic is
not a science journal. It's a magazine. Next you'll be yelling at scientists because the cartoons in Mad are inaccurate.
Peg, this is junior-high level academic stuff. You should know this. I know you've been told before, and yet you come out with the same old canards. Honest scientists and students, Peg, don't twist the facts to suit their immediate argument.
Would you now care to tell us all about National Geographic's retraction of the archeoraptor article? No scientist ever accepted archeoraptor...no fraud, just another demonstration of how creationists will lie the truth out of the universe in order to force feed their agenda.
Edited by Tanndarr, : so I can look like I know how to spell
™ Version 4.2
