Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Assumptions of ToE
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 11 of 32 (529455)
10-09-2009 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Peg
10-09-2009 3:50 AM


The reason that evolution does not need to have abiogenesis to kick start it is that no matter how the first organisms came to be, the evolutionary changes occurred to those organisms. Also simply put, creation would be a form of abiogenesis since your God would had to make life from non-life which is abiogenesis.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Peg, posted 10-09-2009 3:50 AM Peg has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 15 of 32 (529599)
10-09-2009 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by ZenMonkey
10-09-2009 4:49 PM


Nevertheless, in terms of the original question, I believe that Peg is right. In my experience, creationists commonly believe that ToE is based on an assumption of abiogenesis. I agree that they're not right, but it's what creationists think ToE assumes.
Unfortunately no matter how many times that it is brought out that Abiogenesis & Evolution are 2 different entities, they still don't get it.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by ZenMonkey, posted 10-09-2009 4:49 PM ZenMonkey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024