Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8950 total)
37 online now:
caffeine, DrJones*, dwise1, JonF, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle (7 members, 30 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 867,027 Year: 22,063/19,786 Month: 626/1,834 Week: 126/500 Day: 23/61 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Assumptions of ToE
Dr Adequate
Posts: 16107
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 8.3

Message 31 of 32 (530727)
10-14-2009 4:18 PM

Slevesque --- keep going.

You've asked us to "hold onto our replies". Let me know when you've stopped.

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by slevesque, posted 10-14-2009 4:59 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009

Message 32 of 32 (530737)
10-14-2009 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Dr Adequate
10-14-2009 4:18 PM

Yeah sorry, I added by edit that I'll stop at those two assumptions (small chanegs can accumulate to big changes) and the assumptions of the dating methods (uniformitarianism in Darwin's time, constant nuclear decay today)

You can post your own opinion on those two. I'll try to sum up the common objections from everyone and discuss them later on.

Edited by slevesque, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-14-2009 4:18 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019