Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9024 total)
58 online now:
anglagard, frako, kjsimons, PaulK, Tangle (5 members, 53 visitors)
Newest Member: Ryan Merkle
Post Volume: Total: 882,896 Year: 542/14,102 Month: 542/294 Week: 29/269 Day: 9/20 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Your First Ever EVC Post
Member (Idle past 1853 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008

Message 58 of 140 (533113)
10-28-2009 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Wounded King
10-21-2009 8:49 AM

I agree I think I was more polite at the beginning as well (after debating 100+ creationists stating the same PRATs over and over and nutcases like Smooth Operator and the like, your patience starts to wear).

I don't think my position has changed much though.

First post about a year ago: Message 39 in 'What does ID theory say?'

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous.” - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection

"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan

"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Wounded King, posted 10-21-2009 8:49 AM Wounded King has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021