okay, here's the perfect question to ask you: Do you have evidence for the natural development of the process of action potential? A step by step process *involving mutations*.
Do you mean is there evidence
this year? Or a thousand years ago? Or might there be 150 years from now?
We can turn the question around:
Do you have evidence for the natural development of [anything]...?
We have a vast amount of evidence for the natural world and how it works.
But so far we have no empirical evidence for the supernatural. We have a lot of religious belief, but no empirical evidence. We have some 4,000 world religions and some 38,000 sects or denominations of Christianity alone. There doesn't seem to be any empirical evidence to discern which, if any, of the various beliefs might be correct. That's a pretty silly way to run a railroad, eh?
It would seem that if one would argue that the "supernatural" did thus and such, one would first have to provide some evidence that the supernatural even exists.
If you can offer such evidence, then we can begin to determine the characteristics and preferences of that supernatural.
Until then, it is a religious belief and should not be confused with something for which there is empirical evidence.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
™ Version 4.2
