Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Unintelligent design (recurrent laryngeal nerve)
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 370 of 480 (566699)
06-26-2010 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 369 by slevesque
06-25-2010 11:20 PM


Re: Hunting the Secondary Function Snark
slevesque:
Tell me how much research has been done on the route of the RLN.
Granny Magda:
The idea that the RLN has an unknown secondary function - an idea which is intrinsically very far fetched, since the nerve doesn't connect to anything in the chest cavity - is the illegitimate brainchild of the creationism/ID crowd. Are they funding research? If not, why not? It's their baby.
slevesque:
So ... are you saying that little research has been done on this issue ?
Percy:
Are you seriously asking how much research serious scientists have conducted investigating your religious beliefs?
slevesque:
Since when did searching if a biological feature has a function become a religious belief ? What definition of ''religious belief'' are you even using.
And stop with the Red Herrings (GM too), just answer the question.
What religious belief, you unconscionably ask?
The religious belief that ID did the RLN routing, which would result in really piss-poor, incompetent design on the part of the designer unless the saving grace of some hidden secondary function could be found.
And how much research you ask? Well ...
Google Scholar Listing of 84,400 Papers, Studies and Other Works On, About or Discussing the RLN
Not all of these discuss the "routing" of the RLN specifically but I would hazard a guess that within 84,400 presentations one could reasonably say that we already know one hell of a lot about the RLN, its routing, its function, its sensitivity, its structure, etc. and that if some secondary function existed we would know about it by now.
Granny and Percy are right. The insistence that the RLN routing must have some hitherto unseen secondary function that would convert its ugly-poor-bad design into an example of biological perfection by a perfect designer is a religious quest. And one, it would appear, that will not be, nor will ever be, successful.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.
Edited by AZPaul3, : Mom was an English teacher. She would scold me severely if I let these mechanics stand.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 369 by slevesque, posted 06-25-2010 11:20 PM slevesque has not replied

AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8529
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 384 of 480 (566862)
06-28-2010 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 383 by Big_Al35
06-28-2010 9:38 AM


The RLN drops into the chest and loops around a ligament of the lung not the heart!
A "ligament of the lung"?
What part of Aortic artery, either left or right, do you see as "ligament"?
And the Aortic artery is a part of what organ?
You really do not know what you are talking about, do you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 383 by Big_Al35, posted 06-28-2010 9:38 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024