Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Baby Denied Health Care Coverage For Being "Too Fat"
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3263 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 66 of 184 (530420)
10-13-2009 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Phage0070
10-13-2009 3:42 AM


This is an instance where the right thing to do is also the cost effective thing to do. It is far cheaper for a person to go get a check-up and start treating anything that comes up when it's early, rather than waiting until it gets too bad to suffer through, and the poor flood the emergency rooms and can't pay. The population of the country already pays for the health care of the poor because Hospitals get tax money to cover people who can't pay for their emergency care. The current system also has the added side effect of clogging those emergency rooms so that if you, and other rich people, actually have an emergency, they'll be forced to wait at the very doors of the hospital while the guy with diabetes gets his leg amputated because he couldn't afford to get the check up ten years ago that would have caught the diabetes and helped him combat it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Phage0070, posted 10-13-2009 3:42 AM Phage0070 has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3263 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 108 of 184 (530905)
10-15-2009 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by onifre
10-14-2009 12:37 PM


Re: freedom of choice, or not?
Ratings for Daily Show and Colbert: source.
Setting aside the fact that polls of the nation show large support for healthcare reform, these television ratings are bogus.
If you'll notice, there are some minor differences in the titles of the shows compared to what they're normally called. "A" Daily Show and The Colber"T" Repor"T". These names come from during the Writers Guild Strike, when Viacom forced these shows back on the air despite not having writers. In a show of solidarity, both Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert changed the names to emphasize the fact that these are not the quality shows people should expect with their brilliant team of writers. Most of the shows were heavily ad-libbed, and while funny, they resorted to a fake feud with Conan O'Brien just to fill time on all three shows. Ratings would be quite noticeably down during this time. I'm not sure when a representative time would be, but an average over a year or two would probably be better, and I would pick a year without an election or a writer's strike on TDS, TCR {iand[/i] O'Reilly and compare apples to apples.
I still think Fox is going to have higher ratings...but there are probably more than a few liberals who watch Fox for the reality show drama of it rather than because they actually agree with it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by onifre, posted 10-14-2009 12:37 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by onifre, posted 10-16-2009 1:52 PM Perdition has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024