Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   'Some still living' disproves literal truth of the bible
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 264 of 479 (562852)
06-02-2010 7:32 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by marc9000
06-01-2010 8:23 PM


marc9000 writes:
Thank you, this is very important, and IMO is seldom stressed enough. What writer does not seek to put himself in a good light? What other examples are there, other than Biblical, where writers actually disregard/put themselves down in their writings?
This story is Written by Huntard, a good for nothing lazy bum, who likes drinking and having sex outside of marriage. I am not worthy of living so close to my neighbour, who is the shining light of virtue, and a far better person than I am. This man told me there is no god.
There you go, obviously what my neighbour said is true, since I put myself in a bad light.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by marc9000, posted 06-01-2010 8:23 PM marc9000 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by jaywill, posted 06-02-2010 8:24 AM Huntard has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 268 of 479 (562861)
06-02-2010 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 266 by jaywill
06-02-2010 8:24 AM


jaywill writes:
He is interested in your agreeing with Him about sin and the Savior.
Well, I can't see that happening in the forseeable future. There is no such thing as "sin" there are good things and bad things, that's about as far as I go. Also, I won't "love" someone doing bad things, and if the things are sufficiently bad, I might even "hate" them. Or at the very least think him a despiccable person.
For what it is worth to you, you can stand up like a man and simply confess that you are a sinner and cannot help yourself.
I'm not a sinner. I try to lead my live as well as possible, not trying to hurt others through my actions. If I might hurt someone through my actions, the consequences are mine to deal with in the here and now. Of course I can help myself. I've done it many times.
And I know this is off the subject matter. But your innuendo of self pity and morbid remorse does not reflect to me the proper spirit of believing the Gospel message.
I was trying to make a point. I do not view myself as " a good for nothing lazy bum, who likes drinking and having sex outside of marriage." Though that last part about drinking (though never so much that it becomes a problem) and having sexual intercourse, is true. I do not view these things as a bad thing though. Also, I don't think my neighbour is in any way better than me, as humans we are equals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by jaywill, posted 06-02-2010 8:24 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by jaywill, posted 06-02-2010 9:37 AM Huntard has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 274 of 479 (562937)
06-02-2010 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 270 by jaywill
06-02-2010 9:37 AM


jaywill writes:
That is better then saying it will never happen.
I also think it is honest. No one knows the future, so no one can make absolute statements about it. But thank you.
But the future is not totally in our hands.
Of course not, there is always natural disaster, or accidents, to consider.
Let me put it this way. If I had life to live over again I would only ask that I turned to the Lord Jesus sooner. Then I would have more time to enjoy His love and His indwelling presence.
To each is own I guess. I'm glad you found joy in your life though, even if it comes at the cost of sometimes being irrational.
Aside from the things which are good and bad, there is a kind of force, a kind of nature compeling us to do what we hate, and restraining us from doing the good that we love.
Not that I have noticed. Now of course, my life hasn't been terribly difficult, I will admit, but I honestly can't recall an action I took of which at the time I thought "No, better not do this, this is bad". Or didn't take an action even though I thought "Hey, if I did this, that would be really good!". When I think those things, I either do it, or don't do it, according to my thoughts. That is not to say I did some stupid stuff, but never at the time of doing those things did I ever feel like they were stupid things to do.
Behind the "things" there is a power operating in us. So some say we are not sinners because we sinned. Rather we sin because we have this sin nature causing us to.
Never noticed it then.
If you remove the weeds from the surface it seems that they grow back. Something also in man is "sprouting" up this sinful behavior. Getting to the root of the problem means a cure deeper than the symptoms.
Seeing as I'm not experiencing the problem, I think I can do wthout the cure.
That is very good. You are an upstanding and ethical person.
Thank you. You seem to be one as well, even though you do need "god" to "threaten" you into doing good stuff (this is not meant negatively).
But are you glorious? Jesus was not only good. Jesus was gloriously good. He was good with a radiance and splendour which is glorious.
Uhm... no? So what? What does this even mean?
The Gospels says that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
And I say we haven't. Oh look! a stalemate.
And if you should live absolutely perfectly from this day onward, what about the failures of the past ? What will erase the record before God of the past transgressions even if you should be gloriously righteous from today on ?
Nothing, nor should anything. We should learn to live with the mistakes we make, not believe really hard in something and suddenly everything is alright. I don't mean to go Godwin on your ass, but what if Hitler had really, deeply and utterly repented and accepted Jesus, would god then allow him into heave just like that? Don't you see a problem with that (substitute Hitler for a baby raping infant killer, who killed and raped 600 babies, if the Godwin gets too great)?
Imagine a shop of vases where an earthquake has occured. All of the vases are lying around broken in pieces.
Some are broken into a hundred pieces. Some are borken into fifty pieces. Some are broken into twenty pieces. Some into ten, seven, or even five pieces.
Let's say some vases are broken into only TWO large pieces. Now the ones broken into TWO large pieces may say "Well, at least I am not as bad as that one over there. He's broken into twelve shattered pieces. I am only broken into TWO pieces."
The one broken into fewer pieces may seem to be in better condition then the others. But the point is that they are ALL broken. None are whole. All have lost their function and ability to do what they were designed to do.
And all can be repaired, it's just a matter of how much energy you want to put into it.
In the same way, there are sinners who can compare themselves to other sinners and say "Well, I am not as bad as this other sinner." But in the eyes of God "All have sinned". All have fallen short of the glory of God.
Sure, whatever. None have sinned in my eyes, and the stalemate is back again. Now I know you don't think my opinion equal to that of god, but honestly, what I've read of god, I don't think much of his opinion anyway. Now that Jesus fellow, he had some good ideas, some pretty stupid ones as well, but meh, nobody's perfect, eh?
We need not to stand up next to each other. We need to stand up next to the Son of God. John chapter 3 tries to convey this.
Nicodemus was a very good citizen. His name means "Victor of the people". He was humble. He was very smart. He was a good man. Jesus told Nicodemus that he MUST be born from above. He told him that he must be born of God - born again. He needed a new nature born into his being. That is a nature that he was not naturally born with. He needed God to implant a new nature into his being causing him to be born from God, and born again.
Jesus said it "must" be so.
So? I say it mustn't. Oh, there's that stalemate again. As long as you live a good life, I don't give a hoot why you do it. If it doesn't bother anyone else, go your merry way I say.
I have been called away for a bit.
Uhm... ok, I guess.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by jaywill, posted 06-02-2010 9:37 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 330 of 479 (563914)
06-07-2010 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 328 by hERICtic
06-07-2010 10:06 AM


hERICtic writes:
Equal. They lived during the same generation.
Would there not also be people that are not part of Jesus' generation, but are part of Paul's?
Of course drawing a line and saying: "This is where the new generation begins", is kinda impossible, there are shades of gray.
Regardless, it's safe to say that everybody from Jesus' generation is now dead, yet he has not yet returned.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 328 by hERICtic, posted 06-07-2010 10:06 AM hERICtic has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 332 of 479 (563918)
06-07-2010 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 329 by jaywill
06-07-2010 10:10 AM


Re: Moral generation vs Chronological generation
jaywill writes:
Roughly what year, give or take a few, represents the END of "this generation" in Matthew 24:34?
The year the last person alive when Jesus said that dies. So, let's say a baby was born at the exact moment Jesus was crucified (being a few days generous here, but that's rathger irrelevant, I'd say), and it lived a good full life for a person of that era, that would make that somewhere around 90 AD, I'd say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 329 by jaywill, posted 06-07-2010 10:10 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 334 of 479 (563922)
06-07-2010 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 333 by jaywill
06-07-2010 10:39 AM


jaywill writes:
Your tag team partner says 90 AD is a good year to stand for the termination of "this generation" in Matthew 24:34.
Just to be claear, This date is the date which marks the end of the generation, as in, Jesus should've returned before then, and the world should've ended. Clearly, that is not the case.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 333 by jaywill, posted 06-07-2010 10:39 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2315 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 362 of 479 (564380)
06-10-2010 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 361 by jaywill
06-10-2010 7:23 AM


The point here is the word for
jaywill writes:
Please look again at the last two sentences.
That what the signs ARE, not what they are FOR.
Care to try again?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by jaywill, posted 06-10-2010 7:23 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 366 by jaywill, posted 06-10-2010 11:32 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024