God prohibits humans from killing other humans. Later, he orders humans to kill other humans. If god had wanted the second group to be killed, then he should have found another method, rather than having to countermand his earlier commandment, and appear inconsistent. An earthquake, or something of that kind, would have done the trick.
And the distinction drawn between state prohibited killing and state authorised killing? You seem to have sidestepped that point.
-
My earlier criticism still stands, though.
No it doesn't. The state authority round here says so.