|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9200 total) |
| |
Allysum Global | |
Total: 919,197 Year: 6,454/9,624 Month: 32/270 Week: 28/37 Day: 2/5 Hour: 2/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Squaring circles: direct biblical contradictions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iblis Member (Idle past 4118 days) Posts: 663 Joined: |
Hi Apothecus! Modern fundamentalist misconceptions derive from a failure to understand the esoteric concepts of literality and inspiration.
When we say that the Bible is to be interpreted literally, we mean first that a straightforward reading must prevail over later interpretations. That doesn't mean that it isn't full of parables, allegories, metaphors, hyperboles, and other forms of idiom; but rather, that those things are what they are. They are not exclusively what some further later exegesis makes them out to be. This is the principle of peshat. But secondly and more importantly, it means these are the words, no substitutions, no changes, no subtractions, no additions. A good translation, like the Authorized Version of the Christian text or the Biblia Hebraica of the Jewish, makes clear which words necessary for grammatical translation are not found in the original using italics or square brackets, in keeping with this principle. Inspiration is even more misleading, what it means is that the text is poetry. This is true even where it appears to us to be prose, it is still designed to follow specific rhythms and tones. This is one part of why it is so important not to mess with the words, different words have different scansion. Both the Hebrew and the Greek orthodox texts have musical notation attached to them, known as cantillation and neumes. Misinterpreting these concepts provides a steady paycheck for people unable to do honest work like burglary or the practice of law.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iblis Member (Idle past 4118 days) Posts: 663 Joined: |
Do you mean that when anyone is interpreting text as divinely inspired, that it is standard practice for it to be considered poetry? Yes, with a minor quibble about the word "anyone". When correctly interpreting poetry, the term "inspiration" relates to the extent to which a given poem or body of work reflects much larger aspects of the world and our experience of it than the mere details of the poem would entail. A divinely inspired work is one which uses characterization of transcendent beings to give us important messages about ourselves. But further, understanding that the Bible is poetry all through allows us to recognize the huge depth of metaphor involved. Each passage means much more than it appears to on first glance. For example, the creation hymn at the beginning of Genesis is a reworking of prior "Songs of Moses" found in Psalms 148 and as used by David in 103. These Psalms tell us that all that out there, everything there is, is in our immediate reach when mediated by our idea of transcendent mind. Genesis 1 goes further though; in response to the Babylonian planetary model, which attributes specific aspects of creation to specific gods honored on seven weekdays, it asserts that there is ONE being who creates all those godforms or labels and controls our own experience of the whole world, every week, all night and all day long.
Or rather that if you're a fundamentalist, this is how you must necessarily interpret text that is thought to be divinely inspired in order to mesh with your worldview? I've never met a "real" fundamentalist who understood anything except the most superficial aspects of the nature of poetry. They will tell you in one breath that those days of the week in Genesis must be actual 24-hour days and in the next they will say that the days of the week in Daniel have to be years; and then when you ask them why this "literal" Jesus hasn't showed up yet, they will point at Peter where it says a day is a thousand years. They don't seem to be able to grasp the idea that the Bible isn't a science text or a historical chronicle, or a law-book made for them to find loopholes in either.
To me, this makes sense, innately speaking. Why is it that this is such a problem with the fundamentalist crowd? Because it takes away their slave-morality prerogative to interfere with other people's mental activity. As long as they have one book that beats all the rest of human knowledge, given sufficient thumping, they can feel superior to people who go to the trouble of actually getting a good education. As long as they are sure that God agrees with them against the people who mock and abuse them, they can be counted on to be good slaves who are easy to manipulate. Let me just ask this. If the Bible is "literally true" in the more simplistic sense, what's the purpose of those multiple-family paychecks that go out on the grounds that you need someone to interpret it for you? Why do people keep coming round thumping down paraphrases like the NIV and claiming they are "literally true" when they aren't even literal? Answer: it's just a buzzword for them, they are working the old fool/money disengagement process. Tell people what they want to hear, and agree with them while they nod their heads, and they will pick their own pocket for you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iblis Member (Idle past 4118 days) Posts: 663 Joined: |
Romans 1:20 I'm glad you managed to reference this one before the fight-or-flight thing got you. Let's go ahead and look at this passage in context to get a good understanding of what it is saying.
Romans 1:20 writes: For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You have refused to believe the clear and awesome story that the real creation is telling to scientists who devote their lives to understanding its wonders. You do not have the excuse of prior generations and cultures, where literacy was rare and education was hard to come by. It requires a genuine effort of will to dismiss all the evidence that the universe has to offer.
1:21 writes: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. You take real satisfaction in this vain exercise of the power of your mind, and as a result, though you have been exposed to the concept of what God really must be, you have denied it in your heart and set your will upon an imaginary deity which you can understand and imagine. By doing this, you have reduced the splendor of God to a mere filthy creature like yourself. This allows you to distract yourself from the plain teaching which requires you not to be contentious, to resist not evil, to be wise as a serpent and gentle as a dove, with the pretense that the part that is really important is your interpretation of obvious parables and "just so" stories.
1:22 writes: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, This unspeakable hubris has led you to enter into detestable disputations with your betters, each an expert in their field. The inevitable result is that you have made many obvious errors and embarassed yourself. The consequence of this is that your audience are now much less likely to consider any argument which might lead them to a better relationship with the God you claim to be honoring.
1:23 writes: And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. You have totally failed to follow the plain commandment to give up your idolatry, and taken your mental pictures of a young earth, a first-century preacher, and a very slanted, censored version of a book that in reality condemns you, to create a false god who tells you what you want to hear.
1:24 writes: Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: As a result, God has given up on you and left you to your own devices. Without the real power of the spirit, you have been forced to derive your substitute for real transcendent experiences from repressed sexual energy, filling your imagination with abominable misconceptions regarding your fellow humans. This is why the fundamentalist colleges are full of confused and angry transgender types.
1:25 writes:
Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iblis Member (Idle past 4118 days) Posts: 663 Joined: |
Here's a real Bible contradiction, one that serves as a teaching tool:
Matthew 8:11,12 writes: And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Do you understand this lesson? The man Jesus is happy with here is a Roman centurion, a pagan; but he understands obedience:
Matthew 8:9 writes: For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this [man], Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth [it]. God likes this attitude a lot better than he does the sort that glorifies in its own interpretation:
Mark 12:38 writes: And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and [love] salutations in the marketplaces,And the chief seats in the synagogues, and the uppermost rooms at feasts: Which devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayers: these shall receive greater damnation. Do you get that? Not just damnation, greater damnation.
Matthew 7:15-27 writes: Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither [can] a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it. Yes, there are many contradictions in the Bible. But they are certainly not errors. Serious as a heart attack ... Edited by Iblis, : where their worm dieth not and their fire is not quenched
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024