Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-26-2019 7:01 PM
23 online now:
AZPaul3, Coragyps, dwise1, Sarah Bellum (4 members, 19 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,093 Year: 7,129/19,786 Month: 1,670/1,581 Week: 49/443 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is DNA the TOTAL Instruction Set for a Lifeform?
Modulous
Member (Idle past 246 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


(3)
Message 4 of 70 (531648)
10-19-2009 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Elhardt
10-19-2009 4:25 AM


Developmental Biologist Jonathan Wells

I think he once taught embryology at a college once, but I don't think really qualifies him for that title. But that, of course, is an aside.

He says "When an egg's genes are removed and replaced by those of another type of animal, development follows the pattern of the original egg until the embryo dies from the lack of the right proteins".

Did he provide evidence for this claim?

However, when reading about cloning, it was mentioned that cat DNA was put into a rabbit egg, and the outcome was a cat clone. I thought that was impossible based on Wells' description. What am I missing here? Is Wells wrong, or is something else going on in cloning that isn't relevant to what Wells is talking about?

It seems the opposing claim does have evidence. I'd go with the evidence. Wells being wrong sounds like a reasonable conclusion to make, he's often in the position of having the evidence against him.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Elhardt, posted 10-19-2009 4:25 AM Elhardt has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019