Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9178 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,102 Year: 5,359/9,624 Month: 384/323 Week: 24/204 Day: 24/21 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists think Evolutionists think like Creationists.
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 175 of 485 (570328)
07-27-2010 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by Bolder-dash
07-27-2010 1:44 AM


Re: How evolutionists think...
But that is not what the scientific community allows. Instead they specifically say that such a conclusion is absolutely unacceptable, even if that's where the evidence points. So they do not truly believe in following the evidence where it leads.
So if this be the case, give me an example of such.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-27-2010 1:44 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 193 of 485 (570423)
07-27-2010 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Bolder-dash
07-27-2010 9:51 AM


Re: How evolutionists think...
Ho, well science can certainly be wrong.
Sure it can be wrong which is why the Phlogiston theory was thrown out, and replaced with Oxidation-Reduction or why the sun centered solar system replaced the earth centered system. When a scientific theory is found wrong it is corrected which is not the case with creationism.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-27-2010 9:51 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-27-2010 4:45 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


(1)
Message 274 of 485 (571035)
07-29-2010 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by marc9000
07-27-2010 7:34 PM


Sincere congratulations, you’re in an important, memorable phase of your life right now. But if you’re saying that this point in your life is when you’re first becoming most interested in accepting Darwinism and questioning Christianity, I believe it’s rare, I think it is more common in younger people. That’s not a put down, just a statement that young people seek liberation.
It may be rare but it took me almost 30 years of research before I abandoned creationism & theism for evolution & atheism.
It was launched when I was young in a place called Vietnam but I was nearly 50 when I finally accepted the points in evolution and atheism, although not together. I had accepted part of evolution much earlier, but thought of it as guided.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by marc9000, posted 07-27-2010 7:34 PM marc9000 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-30-2010 9:38 AM bluescat48 has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


(1)
Message 281 of 485 (571096)
07-30-2010 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 278 by Bolder-dash
07-30-2010 9:38 AM


from my signature writes:
"There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other" WT Young, 2002
What a silly notion, respect for another lump of chemical stews. He might as well have said there is no better love, than the respect between a human shaped mass of cells, and a sponge shaped mass of cells. Or a lump of clay for that matter.
Don't you realize that this feeling of love and respect is just an illusion, brought on by a corrupted chunk of carbon, joining up with more corrupted junks pieces of carbon? Its like saying a thorn bush should respect e coli.
Love, respect, feelings, emotions, what a faulty mess of chemical hodge podge. Do you love boron? How about uric acid?
I can't figure if your post is a poor attempt at sarcasm or if the quote went totally over your head. Either way it shows one thing, you definitely think we evos think like creos.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 278 by Bolder-dash, posted 07-30-2010 9:38 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 360 of 485 (571485)
07-31-2010 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 354 by Coragyps
07-31-2010 5:19 PM


Re: Ebert's Near Death Experience
But I had no supernatural help at all, just help from 2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)ethylamine.
AKA mescaline
Keyeut!!

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 354 by Coragyps, posted 07-31-2010 5:19 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 437 of 485 (571905)
08-02-2010 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 433 by marc9000
08-02-2010 9:13 PM


Re: The search for meaning
I don’t think it’s all that unusual for a person to hold personal opinions, yet not insist that only those opinions be used to structure or maintain how a society operates.
Then tell that to the Texas school board. A number of members there want to force pseudoscience (creationism) into the science curriculum.
Sure they have a right to have an opinion on creationism, but should not be able to force that view down anyone else's throat.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 433 by marc9000, posted 08-02-2010 9:13 PM marc9000 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 438 by Coyote, posted 08-02-2010 11:12 PM bluescat48 has not replied
 Message 447 by marc9000, posted 08-04-2010 8:30 PM bluescat48 has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4297 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 454 of 485 (572244)
08-04-2010 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 447 by marc9000
08-04-2010 8:30 PM


Re: The search for meaning
Their attempt to force pseudoscience creationism into the science curriculum may have been only an attempt to counter an earlier forcing of pseudoscience (atheism) that’s already established into the science curriculum.
Atheism is not pseudoscience nor does it claim to be science as creationists claims of creation. There is no movement to implement atheism in science. Atheism isn't even an "ism," It is simply a belief in no gods nothing else. There is no Atheist dogma as there is in Fundie Creotardism. Show me an Atheist who wants Atheism included in science classes. The only thing that Atheism & Science have in common is common sense.
Edited by bluescat48, : No reason given.
Edited by bluescat48, : typo for both edits + added line

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 447 by marc9000, posted 08-04-2010 8:30 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024