Creationists think Evolutionists think like Creationists.

I don't. And I'm an evolutionist. In fact, I don't know any evolutionist who does. It's not the picture evolution paints however. Only creationists ever say it does.

And what exactly is so terrible about those questions?

Of course I don't, the source for that quote is Message 41 by tomato. If you want to know where he got it, I suggest asking him. Though I suspect it's from some Christian website or another.

No Big_Al35, he did not. That was a response to people like you who think that evolutionists are evil people. Please for the love of your god, do something about this reading comprehension problem.

Do you enjoy plagiarizing people? I guess that's all that's left if you can't think of a valid response yourself.

Would the conclusion here not be that the creationist's statement is false? Am I missing something here? No problem mate.

Even if evidence points to that it's of absolutely no use, since pointing to that would make anything possible. No it doesn't, and it never has. I don't it's so much of a conscious effort, as a practical outcome. If evidence points to a supernatural cause, then any and all possibilities are equally valid. Since that's of absolutely no use to anyone, it can't help science along, even if it were the case.

No study ever conducted pointed to "the supernatural" as an explanation. Showed they didn't eixst. Never happened either. And why would this have a supernatural cause? Do you know everything? Could it not possibly be a naturalistic cause? How do you know? Well, since it has never looked like that, luckily, we don't have to do that.

For me? A.I'd also like to raise the question Crash asks here, in fact, I asked you about that before. How do you know that this is not the result of a natural cause? Do you know everything?

The problem is, we have as of yet no way to reliabley determine whether or not something is immaterial, or if it originates from the immaterium. As long as no reliable predictions or measurements can be made, how can we ever hope to say something with even the least bit of certainty about it? I mean I can say I'm very confident that evolution happened and is still happening, I can say I'm pretty sure that general relativity is accurate, I can say that bigfoot probably doesn't exist, and I can say that there's probably no way I can fly without aide.Now, what can we reliably say about the immaterium? I can't think of anything. Does this not render the immaterium as explanation completely useless?

My brain? That's probably not one mutation, and that's not how mutations work. There's not one mutation or gene that when switched off prevents you from thinking. It has more to do with brain size/complexity. That's alot longer than 5000 years. And we now know it has to do with brain size/complexity. We do, it's because our brains are big and complex enough to think. I have thought about it. I have yet to see any evidence, that's why I told you the answer was A. Do you have any evidence for me to take into account?

We can't read anything if you don't provide it. Ok. Please produce them then.

Would you mind providing these studies then? If the truth is "supernatural" then yes, that's useless. No law. However, simple logic tells you that if something is supernatural, anything goes. I think we can potentially look for it, I have no idea how, though. It's you who asserts we can. If we want a supernatural explanation we can, if we don't we can't. No he isn't. He's saying that so far as he's aware (ok, he didn't really say it like that, but I think that's what he meant), all studies into the "supernatural" have been shown to be wrong, or have shown that there is no such thing as the "supernatural". The ToE does not, nor has it ever, explained the origins of life.

You do realize no "evolutionist" thinks that it does, don't you?

Well, like any natural occurrence, fossilization leaves evidence, this evidence we can study. Scientists have done this, and so now know how fossils are formed. Everything, as long as you have access to the same fossil. No, for how do you know that is not a natural occurrence. Further, this is not a method of studying the supernatural. We asked you for a method to study the supernatural. I'm guessing the people that say they like sex/are depressed/are psychotic. Yes. And what have they ever found? Yep, nothing. Of course, we do no such thing. I wouldn't know a method of studying the supernatural, I have never been into contact with it. If you do have a method of studying the supernatural, please share it with us. Until that time, we really have no way to decide whether something is supernatural or not.