Adding information to the genome.

Careful now, they are pulling out all stops with the "go read a text book" and "you don't know what you are talking about" arguments.17 pages, 250+ posts and has anyone even come close to trying to actually answer your question by providing good clarification of how information can be significantly increased in the genome? Even clarification of anything would be a start. Admittedly I haven't read every single post, but I think any reasonable man of medium patience and tolerance can only stand reading so much diffusion and obfuscating.Anytime you can get multiple posts from Dr.A inserting his template distractions, you must be doing something right.I admire your perseverance.

I find it very impressive that after 100 posts something could become clear to you....that's sounds premature for you.Care to explain how YOU believe new information can be added to the genome, or did you just come here to moan?

You mean I can join the discussion in the manner of Dr.A? Like I can just say, "When I read gibberish like this, I thoroughly understand why thinking people believe all evolutionists are stupid and wrong."post#39Is that how I should contribute? Edited by Bolder-dash, : edited to demonstrate the inconsistent application of your standards.

Percy,If you are going to be the moderator in a thread where you are not even the moderator, perhaps you could at least do so in a fair and unbiased manner.