Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

A Study of Intelligent Design Debate

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Study of Intelligent Design Debate
lbhandli
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 140 of 210 (3483)
02-05-2002 5:44 PM 		Reply to: Message 139 by John Paul
02-05-2002 5:32 PM

quote:
Actually the hypothesis was well researched and anyone with at least a double-digit IQ would know there is no way to prove a negative. The onus lay with the people spewing such a thing is possible. Duh
​
So why did Behe attempt to do that? Your argument is strange given that is exactly Behe's position. Of course, you don't seem to grasp that Behe also argues that common descent is accurate. This sort of mental gymnastics is generally referred to mental laziness.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by John Paul, posted 02-05-2002 5:32 PM John Paul has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024