Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8961 total)
19 online now:
jar, PaulK (2 members, 17 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 869,361 Year: 1,109/23,288 Month: 1,109/1,851 Week: 233/320 Day: 5/87 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does intelligent design have creationist roots?
Michamus
Member (Idle past 3541 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 52 of 151 (506704)
04-28-2009 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by traderdrew
04-28-2009 11:47 AM


Re: Metascience
traderdrew writes:


I strongly suggest that you use start to utilize your best judgement because there are people out there who want you to hear what they want you to hear.


Has anyone ever not wanted someone to hear what they wanted them to hear? This is dribble.

traderdrew writes:


I never said that we shouldn't get our information from them. I believe that we should also get our information from sources other than them.


Exactly! We should get our information from where they get their information, the universe. That's the beauty of scientific inquiry, you can always check someone's claim against the real world. If it doesn't measure up, then it is easily dismissed.

I certainly hope your other sources don't receive their information from a source YOU can't directly test. If that's the case, then they sound like the typical con man who's only evidence for their claim is "Just trust me".

Edited by Michamus, : typo, geesh, one of those nights.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by traderdrew, posted 04-28-2009 11:47 AM traderdrew has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Phage0070, posted 04-28-2009 3:01 PM Michamus has responded

  
Michamus
Member (Idle past 3541 days)
Posts: 230
From: Ft Hood, TX
Joined: 03-16-2009


Message 54 of 151 (506778)
04-29-2009 12:11 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Phage0070
04-28-2009 3:01 PM


Re: Metascience
Phage0070 writes:


I think that a guiding line when getting your information is if the source of your information wants you to alter your behavior.


What about a cardiologist saying you should eat less salty, fatty foods?

I see where you are coming from, but in my above mentioned scenario, you would be able to independently obtain the data on the effects of salty, fatty foods on your cardiovascular system. This is what defines the difference as you ACCEPT what independently verified information there is on the subject, rather than simply believe your cardiologist's claims.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Phage0070, posted 04-28-2009 3:01 PM Phage0070 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Taq, posted 04-29-2009 6:11 PM Michamus has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020