Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9078 total)
143 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, nwr, Tanypteryx (4 members, 139 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,003 Year: 6,115/6,534 Month: 308/650 Week: 78/278 Day: 0/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is ID properly pursued?
Stile
Member
Posts: 4077
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 3.9


Message 88 of 94 (737540)
09-26-2014 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by taiji2
09-26-2014 12:11 AM


Re: well done
taiji2 writes:

The proper pursuit of Intelligent Laws should seek evidence of an intelligence, not a deity. There would be the simple question of determining whether the laws derived out of chaos or from an aware intelligence.

Fantastic.

The only problem is identifying whether or not a law is naturally derived or intelligently derived.
What are the defining characteristics of each?

Science should be utilized to establish a chronology for laws of nature/science. In other words, how old are the laws?

An interesting question for knowledge's sake, but I don't understand how this will help identify natural vs. intelligent.
Are really, really old laws intelligent, or natural?
Are young laws intelligent, or natural?
Why?

Are laws front-end fact or do laws evolve with a changing universe?

Again, interesting for knowledge's sake... but how does it help distinguish natural vs. intelligent?
Are constant-laws natural or intelligent?
Are evolving-laws natural or intelligent?
Why?

Science should take these questions as far as they can be taken with observation and statistical inference.

I could be mistaken as I do not work in such fields... but I believe science is already monitoring such things for any detectable variance... for the sake of just knowing what happened and what is.

This is an opening thought.

And it's very good. Best ideas I've heard for identifying intelligence or not. It just needs some specifics and to be fluffed out a bit more.
If you can get to the bottom of the two big "why" questions above... you'll be miles ahead of any other intelligence discovery mission.

My thoughts:

If there is an intelligence behind things, the laws of the universe should reflect some sort of conscious effort towards a goal... some sort of caring for something. Possibly (but not necessarily) humans or life as a whole. Possibly some aspect of the universe we haven't even discovered yet.

However, if the laws of the universe reflect an unfeeling, unrelenting, unguided march to nothing... it would seem to me that this would lean towards being evidence that they are natural and were not created by an intelligence.

What do you think?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by taiji2, posted 09-26-2014 12:11 AM taiji2 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by taiji2, posted 09-26-2014 3:46 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied
 Message 92 by taiji2, posted 09-28-2014 10:08 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022