Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9023 total)
47 online now:
PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat) (2 members, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: Ashles
Post Volume: Total: 882,679 Year: 325/14,102 Month: 325/294 Week: 81/136 Day: 0/33 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Is ID properly pursued?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is ID properly pursued?
Larni
Member (Idle past 40 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 47 of 94 (468396)
05-29-2008 8:32 AM 		Reply to: Message 43 by Marcosll
05-26-2008 7:37 AM

Re: ID
Marcosll writes:

Contrary to popular belief (because it's taboo in science) there are many scientific (used in the strict sense of the word) studies that show there is something metaphysical in the human mind occurs and can affect the world around.

Where are these studies, I would be fascinated to read them.

Er...but you just said there are many such studies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Marcosll, posted 05-26-2008 7:37 AM Marcosll has responded
Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Marcosll, posted 05-30-2008 10:09 AM Larni has responded
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 40 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 51 of 94 (468572)
05-30-2008 12:41 PM 		Reply to: Message 50 by Marcosll
05-30-2008 10:09 AM

Re: ID
I'm sorry, mate but I can't get the links to work.

There is a way to shorten links in the db codes:

A shortened link for you, mate

Just click peek on this page to see how.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Marcosll, posted 05-30-2008 10:09 AM Marcosll has not yet responded
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 40 days)
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 94 of 94 (737731)
09-29-2014 6:39 AM 		Reply to: Message 92 by taiji2
09-28-2014 10:08 AM

Rational thought should not be presumed contained only within the confines of any profession.

This is true. But it should be thought of as confined to the scientific method or philiosphy.

The problem is that it is not possible to conclude that something is designed as we have no evidence for the need for design: we only have incredulity that something could not be designed.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by taiji2, posted 09-28-2014 10:08 AM taiji2 has not yet responded
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021