Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 58 (9175 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: sirs
Post Volume: Total: 917,652 Year: 4,909/9,624 Month: 257/427 Week: 3/64 Day: 1/2 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is ID properly pursued?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4277 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 64 of 94 (539510)
12-16-2009 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Bolder-dash
12-16-2009 7:53 AM


Re: Evolution through natural selection is a very satisfying explanation
A wing has to be perfect before it is any use at all. Before it is a perfect wing, it would be an un-aerdynamic blob.
That would make sense only if wings were "designed" for flying which is not necessarily the case. As with many changes in structure, the change came before the use. The same can be said for lungs, legs, amniotic sacks, urea rather than ammonia excretion & eyes. The only way these so called irruducibly complex organs can be claimed is if they were what the change was for prior to the change, which does not appear to be the case.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Bolder-dash, posted 12-16-2009 7:53 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024