Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9042 total)
98 online now:
ringo (1 member, 97 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 886,150 Year: 3,796/14,102 Month: 101/315 Week: 101/131 Day: 22/29 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Is ID properly pursued?
Wounded King
Member (Idle past 3037 days)
Posts: 4149
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Joined: 04-09-2003

Message 74 of 94 (623287)
07-09-2011 4:41 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Taq
07-08-2011 2:23 AM

The current crop have made it abundantly clear that they will not be doing ID research. I can't say that I blame them. ID, in its current form, does not lend itself to scientific experimentation.

I think this is rather unfair, there are maybe a handful of researchers who are doing proper experimental work. The problem as I see it is more that they don't have a really coherent framework or ID theory to build hypotheses on.

People like Doug Axe and Ann Gauger are at least performing proper lab experimentation. I don't think that any of their work makes a coherent argument either for ID or against traditional darwinian evolutionary trajectories, but again I'd put this down to the lack of a sufficient theoretical framework for ID. I assume that they themselves believe they do.



This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Taq, posted 07-08-2011 2:23 AM Taq has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Taq, posted 07-11-2011 2:47 AM Wounded King has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021